VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Anita Wills <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 4 Sep 2007 09:42:22 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (206 lines)
I don't know where you are going with this post. I responded to a post in 
which the person said, their ancestors fought in the Civil War to free, "My" 
people. I stated that the poster knew I was African American, and I did not 
know what his race was. Now you are sending a post saying that the I am 
focusing on the color of someones skin. In the first place my immediate 
family contains almost every race in this nation. My lines have changed 
races several times since it's inception. I also pointed out that I have 
direct ancestors who fought in the Revolutionary War, War of 1812, and in 
the Civil War. This was again, in response to the posters message, which was 
directed at me.

So I am puzzled as to your attack on me (UMMM).

Anita



>From: James Brothers <[log in to unmask]>
>Reply-To: Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history         
>      <[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: Gov. Kaine Pardons Gabriel Prosser
>Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 00:12:05 -0400
>
>Anita
>
>Should the colour of our skin matter when we post on the list? Do I,  and 
>everyone else on the list, have to preface everything I write to  achieve 
>legitimacy in your eyes with my race and genetic makeup? You  have a 
>tendency to go off half cocked and accuse other list members  of opinions 
>and statements that the rest of us don't see.
>
>For the record, if it matters, my ancestry is (as best we can  determine 
>it): English, Irish, Scot, Welsh, French, Norwegian,  Ottowa, and Mohawk. 
>One of my direct ancestors, Benjamin Franklin  Lee, died from wounds 
>received while a member of the Union Army. He  had two brothers, both of 
>whom served as officers in the Union Army.  I have had relatives in every 
>war fought in what became the US, often  (at least until the Civil War) on 
>both sides.
>
>James Brothers, RPA
>[log in to unmask]
>
>
>
>On Sep 3, 2007, at 22:42, Anita Wills wrote:
>
>>Well, you have one over me, as you KNOW I am African American, and  I 
>>don't know what race you are (UMMM). By the way, my ancestors  fought in 
>>the Civil War, the war of 1812, and in the Revolutionary  War, so that 
>>your ancestors could be free. So get your facts  straight before you blast 
>>off.
>>
>>This forum is not about you or me, it is an open forum. I did not  aim my 
>>original response to you, but to the list. Sorry you took it  personally.
>>
>>Anita Wills
>>
>>
>>>From: "Lyle E. Browning" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>Reply-To: Discussion of research and writing about Virginia  history      
>>>         <[log in to unmask]>
>>>To: [log in to unmask]
>>>Subject: Re: Gov. Kaine Pardons Gabriel Prosser
>>>Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 22:21:31 -0400
>>>
>>>I would really appreciate it if before you fire off one of your   heated 
>>>polemics, if you would do us all a favor and get your  facts  right. 
>>>First, check the definition of genocide. Yours as  posted is  just wrong.
>>>
>>>Your presumptions about who I am and what I believe are so far  off  the 
>>>mark as to be laughable. For your information, my  ancestor died  in the 
>>>Civil War so that your ancestors could be  free. What, you ask?  My 
>>>great, great, great uncle Oliver Browning  died at the Battle of  Shiloh, 
>>>having enlisted as part of the 25th  Wisconsin. This 20 year  old man 
>>>never had the opportunity to  marry, to have children or to do  any of 
>>>the things that people  did in their lives, all because he  believed in a 
>>>cause greater  than himself. Madame, you have absolutely  no business 
>>>making  presumptions of any sort about me.
>>>
>>>Lyle Browning
>>>
>>>
>>>On Sep 3, 2007, at 7:59 PM, Anita Wills wrote:
>>>
>>>>Hello,
>>>>Under your concept there should have been no Revolutionary, nor   Civil 
>>>>War (where many people died). I guess you would argue that   regardless 
>>>>of the inhumanity put on these people, they are  always  supposed to be 
>>>>laughing happy slaves. By the way, the  people who  decided what was 
>>>>wrong and right, were changing the  rules and laws  as they saw fit.  
>>>>Although they put themselves up  as Gods, they  were just human beings.
>>>>
>>>>Anita
>>>>>From: "Lyle E. Browning" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>Reply-To: Discussion of research and writing about Virginia   history   
>>>>>            <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>To: [log in to unmask]
>>>>>Subject: Re: Gov. Kaine Pardons Gabriel Prosser
>>>>>Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 16:25:58 -0400
>>>>>
>>>>>Somewhere along the line I've read that two wrongs don't make  a   
>>>>>right. Somewhere.
>>>>>
>>>>>So please let us not trot out these red herrings again.
>>>>>
>>>>>Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>>Lyle Browning
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>On Sep 3, 2007, at 3:49 PM, Anita Wills wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Yet,
>>>>>>Was it not genocide for Europeans to come into the America  and   
>>>>>>murder Indians? Was it not genocide to bring millions of   Africans  
>>>>>>(thousands of whom died), into the Americas, and  strip  them of  
>>>>>>their identies as human beings? If Prosser and  Turner  knew of  
>>>>>>genocide they learned it at the Masters Feet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Anita Wills
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>From: "Lyle E. Browning" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>>>Reply-To: Discussion of research and writing about Virginia    
>>>>>>>history              <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>>>To: [log in to unmask]
>>>>>>>Subject: Re: Gov. Kaine Pardons Gabriel Prosser
>>>>>>>Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 15:08:31 -0400
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>From the Associated Press:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"Virginia governor 'pardons' slave who led 'Gabriel's Rebellion'
>>>>>>>>The Associated Press
>>>>>>>>August 31, 2007
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Where in all this does a comparison of nobility of purpose  meet   
>>>>>>>means  and methods?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Rebellion to become free will justifiably be seen as serving   the   
>>>>>>>nobility of purpose end of the argument. On that, both  the  Am Rev  
>>>>>>>and  Gabriel's Rebellion are equal, albeit at  vastly  different  
>>>>>>>scales.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>At the pointy end of the stick, wherein after the Dec. of  Ind.   was 
>>>>>>>  read, measures of a more physical nature were  taken.  Knowing  
>>>>>>>full  well what would happen once it was  read, one can  argue that  
>>>>>>>the Am  Rev leaders only had to  wait for action to  develop as the  
>>>>>>>authorities  moved to put  down the venture.  Conflict/Civil War  
>>>>>>>then ensued with  the  colonials coming out  on top.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>In contrast, Turner's higher ideal was simply genocide.     
>>>>>>>Indiscriminate killing of men, women and children is murder,    
>>>>>>>however  draped in the verbiage of freedom.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>What separates the Am Rev and possibly Gabriel, from Turner    
>>>>>>>certainly  is the means and methods by which the ideals may  be   
>>>>>>>achieved. The  Haitian Revolution was at first a  bloodbath that   
>>>>>>>has been later  sanctified by those at  several removes from it   
>>>>>>>into a glorious  expression of  freedom. That would appear to   
>>>>>>>lessen the value of the  lives  lost so long as freedom rings.  That  
>>>>>>>kind of specious  reasoning  was also inherent in Stalin,  Mao and  
>>>>>>>Pol Pot, to  name but a few whose  results justified  those means.   
>>>>>>>Haitians ended up switching the color  of master,  but little  of  
>>>>>>>substance is now discernible, apart from the    historiography of  
>>>>>>>the event.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Gabriel's aim, according to Edgerton, was not genocide, but   rather  
>>>>>>>a  negotiated settlement ending slavery. However,  what  muddies  the 
>>>>>>>  waters is the issue of statements made  concerning  the conduct  of 
>>>>>>>the  rebellion. Basically, join or  die seems to  have been the  
>>>>>>>directive,  apart from  Methodists, Quakers and  Frenchmen. Is  
>>>>>>>Edgerton generally   viewed as reading the  documents correctly or  
>>>>>>>has he ventured  rather  far out onto the  revisionist limb?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>For those of you who will undoubtedly jump into the fray, I  am   
>>>>>>>well  aware that in the Am Rev, there were quasi-   institutionalized 
>>>>>>>  incidents of brutal behavior on both   Colonial  and Tory sides, 
>>>>>>>similar  probably to the Border  Wars  in the 1850's  onward.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>State to state relations were the ideal and the practice  during   
>>>>>>>the  Am Rev, not using genocide as a means of  igniting  conflict.  
>>>>>>>The  questions are: Did Gabriel advocate  genocide,  was he unable  
>>>>>>>to  control more volatile elements  in his group,  was genocidal  
>>>>>>>advocacy  legitimately placed at  his door?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Lyle Browning
>>>>>>
>>>>>>_________________________________________________________________
>>>>>>Test your celebrity IQ.  Play Red Carpet Reveal and earn  great   
>>>>>>prizes! http://club.live.com/red_carpet_reveal.aspx?   
>>>>>>icid=redcarpet_hotmailtextlink2
>>>>
>>>>_________________________________________________________________
>>>>Get the device you want, with the HotmailŪ you love. http://  
>>>>www.windowsmobile.com/hotmailmobile?ocid=MobileHMTagline_1
>>
>>_________________________________________________________________
>>Test your celebrity IQ.  Play Red Carpet Reveal and earn great  prizes! 
>>http://club.live.com/red_carpet_reveal.aspx? 
>>icid=redcarpet_hotmailtextlink2

_________________________________________________________________
Share your special parenting moments! 
http://www.reallivemoms.com?ocid=TXT_TAGHM&loc=us

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US