LISTSERV - VA-HIST Archives - LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

	LISTSERV Archives
	VA-HIST Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Condense Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Content-Transfer-Encoding:	7bit
Sender:	Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:	Re: NYT praises "The New World," new version
From:	Louise Bernikow <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Thu, 26 Jan 2006 12:25:24 EST
Content-Type:	text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (11 lines)

I'm puzzling over not how much it matters that Malick "got it wrong"-- but
what we make of the "errors," which seem more choices than errors. It's not like
the film maker didn't know at least the main points of what we know-- that
the romance is probably hooey, that Pocahontas was 11 or 12, etc. That the
Powhatan's didnt attack the fort with Pocahontas inside it. That she wasnt tutored
by an English nanny-type. etc. How do we analyze this film?
Louise Bernikow

To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US