 
| Sender: |
|
| Date: |
Fri, 19 Jul 2013 20:35:47 -0400 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Message-ID: |
<84ED5644BB4046EB8B0D632A71F6E58C@heyred> |
| Subject: |
|
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
| In-Reply-To: |
<8338F382263B467AA963261D56AA0F45@HOME01> |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original |
| From: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Thank you so much, this is clear and now I understand.
Margie
-----Original Message-----
From: Westview
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 1:31 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [VA-ROOTS] Researching Virginia Orphan Books 1700 - 1735
A minor child who lost his/her father was considered an orphan whether or
not his/her mother was alive. A mother did not have "ownership" of her own
children. It was necessary for a male, relative or otherwise, to be
appointed guardian to oversee the child's upbringing and look out for it's
financial interests in the estate. Sometimes the father appointed a
guardian in his will, if not the parish would handle it. After the
Revolution the courts took over.
kathy
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html
|
|
|
