VA-ROOTS Archives

December 2005

VA-ROOTS@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Kathleen Much <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Kathleen Much <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 12 Dec 2005 09:50:26 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
On 12/11/05, Nick Sturm wrote:
> Would not a digital file projected onto a classroom wall not constitute a
> fixed form in this discussion and provide ground for flunking any student
> who quoted "too much" of one of those projections in his answers to exam
> questions?

The US courts have held that digital files are copyrightable as "fixed form".

The problem with a student quoting "too much" verbatim is plagiarism
(an academic violation), not copyright infringement. (Presumably the
student is not publishing his exam answers. If he is, that's another
serious honor code violation in most universities.)

Kathleen Much
The Book Doctor

To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2