VA-ROOTS Archives

November 2009

VA-ROOTS@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"Research and writing about Virginia genealogy and family history." <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Laurie McKenna <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 3 Nov 2009 12:11:21 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
"Research and writing about Virginia genealogy and family history." <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
Here is one I'm not sure I understand.  In the 1790 and 1800 tax lists for
Charlotte Co there are 2 William Fosters.  One is tagged as "good" and the
other as "wag"[goner].  Has anyone seen "good" used before and does it mean
anything other than what it seems?  I've seen modifiers related to
occupation and parish or waterway where a man lived, or "son of" which is
always helpful, but not "good".  Thanks for the help.  (And thanks to Bunny
and Steve for putting the tax lists on line.  It's a great resource).

Laurie McKenna

To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2