VA-ROOTS Archives

February 2011

VA-ROOTS@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
"Research and writing about Virginia genealogy and family history." <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Bill Davidson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:37:41 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Reply-To:
"Research and writing about Virginia genealogy and family history." <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
A document from the early-mid-1700s uses the term "mother-in-law," 
where it APPEARS that "step-mother" would be the term that would be 
used today.  Have others seen this same use of the term "mother-in-
law" on "old" documents?

If the woman in question was actually the grandmother (versus a step-
mother), would "grandmother" have been the expected term in the 
1700s?  Has anyone seen any OTHER term used for "grandmother?"  
Thanks.

To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2