VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Diana Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 16 Aug 2001 16:34:08 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
Dear Marilyn:

>Sometimes it was used as a way of proceeding against the person who was the bail for the defendeant. >

 -- "the person who was the bail for the defendant." -- Does this mean
that he was representing the defendant...I am trying to find out if
Samuel Kercheville was the debtor or representing the debtor...

Thanks,   Diana

To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US