VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Date:
Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:06:12 -0400
Content-Disposition:
inline
Reply-To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
From:
David Kiracofe <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (266 lines)
Actually the New England secession movement started earlier than that -- at least by the time of the Jefferson presidency.  But it wasn't just New England -- it also included New York.   Alexander Hamilton was deeply involved and one of his motives for trying to block Aaron Burr's political career in New York in 1804 was to prevent the ambitious Burr from getting wind of the disunion project -- knowing that Burr would want to lead it to his own advantage.  Of course, that backfired, Hamilton was killed, and Burr went on the try his hand as dissolving the union elsewhere.

But the question of secession's un-constitutionality has been settled already, so I doubt the yankees will go.

David Kiracofe

David Kiracofe
History
Tidewater Community College
Chesapeake Campus
1428 Cedar Road
Chesapeake, Virginia 23322
757-822-5136
>>> <[log in to unmask]> 10/13/08 3:40 PM >>>
 Of course, the first secession movement was a northern one as a result of northern dissatisfaction over the War of 1812 and against their valued trading partner, England.

I wouldn't mind if those northern states re-raised the issue and acted on it.

J South


 


 

-----Original Message-----
From: Anne Pemberton <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 3:34 pm
Subject: Re: REL









J. South,?
?

There is strong evidence that one of the Vice Presidential candidates is/was 
involved in a secessionist movement.?
?

Anne?
?

Anne Pemberton?

[log in to unmask]

http://www.erols.com/apembert?

http://www.educationalsynthesis.org?

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <[log in to unmask]>?

To: <[log in to unmask]>?

Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 3:24 PM?

Subject: Re: REL?
?


> In fact, from 1825-1840 the cadets at West Point learned government from 
> the text of William Rawle's book, A View of the Constitution of the United 
> States of America.? The book taught the prevailing view that secession was 
> an absolute right of each state, which could decide at any time whether it 
> wanted to continue as a member of the Union.?

>?

> Lincoln never gave the US courts the opportunity to render an opinion on 
> the Constitutionality of secession.? He just summarily called for the 
> raising of an army to invade the initially seceding states, and thereby 
> drove states that had not yet seceded, like Virginia, out of the Union; 
> and drove REL into the service of Virginia rather than the Federal 
> government.?

>?

> I suspect we have not heard the last of secession in the US.?

>?

> J South?

>?

>?

>?

>?

>?

>?

>?

> -----Original Message-----?

> From: James Brothers <[log in to unmask]>?

> To: [log in to unmask]

> Sent: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 9:36 am?

> Subject: Re: REL?

>?

>?

>?

>?

>?

>?

>?

>?

>?

> At the time there was considerable debate as to the legality of secession. 
> It was resolved, rather messily by the war. But constitutionally, it is my 
> understanding, that the right of secession is still debatable. So it was 
> not "illegal". And for the record before Anne jumps all over me, as far as 
> I know all of my relatives, including the Lees, were Yankees.??

> ??

>?

> On Oct 12, 2008, at 9:59 AM, Anne Pemberton wrote:??

> ??

>?

>> J. South,??

>?

>>??

>?

>> Actually, the president only acted AFTER the south illegally > seceded, 
>> and then attacked the federal garrison at Fort Sumpter. > Even had the 
>> secession been legal, which it wasn't, taking over the > Fort at Sumpter 
>> was not at all legal.??

>?

>>??

>?

>> So don't blame the man who happened to be siting in the White House > 
>> when the south lost its marbles.??

>?

>>??

>?

>> Anne??

>?

>>??

>?

>> Anne Pemberton??

>?

>> [log in to unmask]

>?

>> http://www.erols.com/apembert??

>?

>> http://www.educationalsynthesis.org??

>?

>> ______________________________________??

>?

>> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the > 
>> instructions at??

>?

>> http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html??

> ??

>?

> ______________________________________??

>?

> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions 
> at??

>?

> http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html??

>?

>?

>?

>?

>?

>?

> ______________________________________?

> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions 
> at?

> http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html ?

______________________________________?

To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at?

http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html?



 


______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US