VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"J. Douglas Deal" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 16 Jan 2006 11:52:10 -0500
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (26 lines)
Randy:

There *are* statistics, but they are irregular and partial (or not what we
really wish they had counted in the first place) for the whole colonial
era. At the moment, the best numbers (actual counts and estimates) are to
be found in the works of the "new" social and economic historians of the
colonial Chesapeake. Anything by historians like Russell Menard, Lorena S.
Walsh, Lois Green Carr, Darrel and Anita Rutman, Allan Kulikoff, John
McCusker, Peter Bergstrom, Philip Morgan, and Susan Westbrook, among
others, can be trusted to be pretty accurate. Some colonial statistics
(maybe most of what you seek) will be gathered in a chapter of the newest
(third or "Millennial") edition of Historical Statistics of the United
States, to be released in 5 volumes and online by Cambridge University
Press in March 2006. Meanwhile, the old ("Bicentennial" edition) of the
same work will have to do.

Douglas Deal
Professor of History and Chair of History Department
State University of New York at Oswego
Oswego, NY 13126
[log in to unmask]
(315)-312-5632

To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US