VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Apple Message framework v753)
Sender:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 30 Apr 2008 12:26:49 -0400
Reply-To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: DNA In Jefferson-Hemings controversy
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<4f5501c8aaae$41f9f1f0$2f01a8c0@Corneliussen>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
From:
"Stephan A. Schwartz" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines) 
Both as an experimentalist in a scientific discipline, and as an  
historian, I want to voice my absolute support for this point.

-- Stephan

On 30 Apr 2008, at 06:37, S. Corneliussen wrote:

> Scientific proof is of a different character than even the best  
> historical interpretation. In my view that distinction requires  
> more respect than it has sometimes received in the Hemings-TJ debate.


______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US