Thanks for the reference.  The odd thing is that the "quilt" fraud is
not even a heritage; no one had ever heard of this nonsense until that
stupid book (Hidden in Plain View) was written; then suddenly this about
a "heritage" that never existed.  

Paul Finkelman
President William McKinley Distinguished Professor of Law
     and Public Policy
Albany Law School
80 New Scotland Avenue
Albany, New York   12208-3494

518-445-3386 
[log in to unmask]
>>> [log in to unmask] 01/23/07 4:44 PM >>>
Paul Finkelman wrote:
> You are right here; why people want to believe this nonsense is
> fabulously interesting; that people do believe it, and resist all
> evidence to contrary, is deeply tragic.
>
>   
There is a very good book that sheds much light on this apparent puzzle 
("why people believe the darndest things..."). It is David Lowenthal's 
Possessed by the Past: The Heritage Crusade and the Spoils of History. 
In the book, Lowenthal explores the huge differences (and the overlap) 
between history and heritage. The latter is an amalgam myth, legend, 
wishful thinking, sheer invention, and scraps of actual history that is 
fabricated to shore up collective or group identity. A heritage can be 
shared by an entire country or by any sort of smaller group for which 
solidarity and self-esteem matter. As Lowenthal notes, "Heritage thrives

on persisting error. 'Getting its history wrong is crucial for the 
creation of a nation,'" according to French nationalist Ernst Renan.

I recommend the book to all. There is also a good article by Lowenthal 
available online. It appears in the periodical History and Memory and is

entitled "Fabricating Heritage."  The "quilt code" fits the heritage 
mold to a "t."

Doug Deal

To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the
instructions
at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html