Thanks for the reference. The odd thing is that the "quilt" fraud is not even a heritage; no one had ever heard of this nonsense until that stupid book (Hidden in Plain View) was written; then suddenly this about a "heritage" that never existed. Paul Finkelman President William McKinley Distinguished Professor of Law and Public Policy Albany Law School 80 New Scotland Avenue Albany, New York 12208-3494 518-445-3386 [log in to unmask] >>> [log in to unmask] 01/23/07 4:44 PM >>> Paul Finkelman wrote: > You are right here; why people want to believe this nonsense is > fabulously interesting; that people do believe it, and resist all > evidence to contrary, is deeply tragic. > > There is a very good book that sheds much light on this apparent puzzle ("why people believe the darndest things..."). It is David Lowenthal's Possessed by the Past: The Heritage Crusade and the Spoils of History. In the book, Lowenthal explores the huge differences (and the overlap) between history and heritage. The latter is an amalgam myth, legend, wishful thinking, sheer invention, and scraps of actual history that is fabricated to shore up collective or group identity. A heritage can be shared by an entire country or by any sort of smaller group for which solidarity and self-esteem matter. As Lowenthal notes, "Heritage thrives on persisting error. 'Getting its history wrong is crucial for the creation of a nation,'" according to French nationalist Ernst Renan. I recommend the book to all. There is also a good article by Lowenthal available online. It appears in the periodical History and Memory and is entitled "Fabricating Heritage." The "quilt code" fits the heritage mold to a "t." Doug Deal To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html