VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:36:22 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (133 lines)
To which I only wish to reply, and with no irony intended . . .

Amen :)

All best,
Kevin

---- Original message ----
>Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 12:08:15 -0400
>From: "Lyle E. Browning" <[log in to unmask]>  
>Subject: Re: New Presidential Descendant Claimant  
>To: [log in to unmask]
>
>Herbert is correct in his remarks about the possibility. And Sandy is  
>certainly a red-head nickname. And his final point about the DNA  
>testing is the one that all should take away from this discussion.  
>Without additional testing, all the analysis of existing and known  
>documents will not settle the issue.
>
>Science rules, OK.
>
>Lyle Browning, RPA
>
>
>On Oct 29, 2008, at 11:57 AM, Anne Pemberton wrote:
>
>> Herb,
>>
>> You are committing the sin that you accuse others of ... lots of  
>> maybes in your remark, none of which you can prove. You can't even  
>> prove that there was a red-headed slave on the property. A name  
>> doesn't establish any fact whatsoever. You seem anxious to jump on  
>> almost anything that could be made into an excuse for Jefferson's  
>> paternity.
>>
>> Anne
>>
>> Anne Pemberton
>> [log in to unmask]
>> http://www.erols.com/apembert
>> http://www.educationalsynthesis.org
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Herbert Barger" <[log in to unmask] 
>> >
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 11:15 AM
>> Subject: Re: New Presidential Descendant Claimant
>>
>>
>> Mr Corneliussen is absolutely correct that it is "possible" that a  
>> slave
>> inherited from Peter Jefferson (Thomas Jefferson's father) could have
>> carried the Jefferson DNA from past Jefferson males. This slave's  
>> name was
>> "SANDY", a name that denotes reddish hair, and this man could have  
>> fathered
>> a male heir who "may" have been a father to some of Sally's  
>> children. Please
>> remember that only ONE Hemings family member was DNA tested.
>>
>> Herb Barger
>> Jefferson Family Historian
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history
>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Steven T. Corneliussen
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 7:32 AM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: [VA-HIST] New Presidential Descendant Claimant
>>
>> And please forgive me if I'm misinterpreting something related from  
>> Kevin
>> Hardwick's Oct. 12 revised list of the things that we can "say about  
>> Sally
>> Hemings that no one is likely to dispute." Item 5 on that revised list
>> says that the "father of one of [SH's] children -- Eston Hemings --  
>> was
>> descended from Thomas Jefferson's paternal grandfather; that is to  
>> say, we
>> can narrow the list of possible fathers for this child to Thomas
>> Jefferson, TJ's brother, his paternal uncles, and his paternal  
>> cousins."
>>
>> It seems to me that, at a minimum, this phrasing fails to make  
>> completely
>> clear what is known about the radius of the circle of paternity
>> candidates. That complete clarity is important because many  
>> participants
>> in Hemings-TJ discussions, and almost all participants in the media,
>> presume that the circle includes only Jeffersons who were routinely
>> acknowledged at the time as members of the extended Jefferson  
>> family. In
>> my view it's important to stipulate specifically the possibility of
>> paternity by some unknown carrier of the Jefferson DNA marker within  
>> the
>> enslaved population. We know that the DNA marker crossed the race  
>> line. We
>> do not know whether it crossed the race line in a generation earlier  
>> than
>> the one that produced Eston Hemings. Now, this may well be an  
>> outlandish
>> possibility in terms of the historical evidence. But because the DNA
>> evidence says nothing whatsoever about it, as a matter of DNA  
>> science the
>> circle of paternity candidates must actually be defined as wider  
>> than the
>> circle of males in the known, acknowledged, extended Jefferson  
>> family. As
>> a matter of DNA science, we simply do not know the radius of the  
>> circle of
>> paternity candidates. (And yes, here I have repeated myself nearly
>> verbatim, but in this case it seemed necessary.)
>>
>> ______________________________________
>> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the  
>> instructions at
>> http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
>> ______________________________________
>> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the  
>> instructions at
>> http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
>
>______________________________________
>To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
>http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
Kevin R. Hardwick, Ph.D.
Department of History
James Madison University

______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US