VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Message-ID:
Sender:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Jon Kukla <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 5 Jul 2017 11:19:32 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
In an essay on the Constitution published in Sunday's NYT, Garry Wills
explains James Madison's thinking about factions and the common good by
suggesting that Madison's ideas reflected "a common practice" that Will
describes as follows:

"When a landowner in Virginia wished to sell property, neither he nor his
potential buyer was allowed to set the price. That would be acting as
judges in their own case. Instead, each chose a reputable arbiter, one
likely to be respected by each of them and by others; those representatives
chose a third person, who would, with them, set a price that all could
accept as 'disinterested.'"

Sounds like a form of arbitration, but I'm not familiar with it in 18th-c
Virginia land transactions.
I'm especially skeptical about Wills's assertion that parties to a private
land sale would not have been "allowed to set the price."


-- 
Jon Kukla                            www.jonkukla.com
________________

______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

This list is made possible by a grant from the U.S. Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS).

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US