Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 15 Apr 2007 12:02:06 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
You and Mr. Wienchek have confirmed my thoughts on Wickipedia. The first
time I visited the site in researching a project and saw that anyone could
edit the information a red flag went up.
Harriott Lomax
From: "Stephan A. Schwartz" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To: Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history
<[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [VA-HIST] "Americans" and Wikipedia
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 00:21:01 -0400
>I am active on three lists in three quite different disciplines, and every
>person, on every list thinks Wikipedia is garbage, based on their survey of
>it, in the areas where they have competence. That has certainly been my
>experience. Like Henry I have corrected mistakes, only to go back and find
>them retro-"corrected" into error. Often on the simplest, and most solid of
>facts. Henry's comments were polite.
>
>-- Stephan
>
>On 13 Apr 2007, at 23:33, [log in to unmask] wrote:
>
>>oh, it's a good thing many of you all have your "advanced" degrees so you
>>can make fun of them.
>>
>>
>>J South
>>
>>
>>
>>************************************** See what's free at http://
>>www.aol.com.
_________________________________________________________________
Download Messenger. Join the i’m Initiative. Help make a difference today.
http://im.live.com/messenger/im/home/?source=TAGHM_APR07
|
|
|