Thank you, Anita.
-- Stephan
On 14 Jun 2007, at 21:06, Anita Wills wrote:
> Stephan,
> This is an excellent response, and well written. I remember that we
> discussed this in one of my history classes, and it never hurts to
> hear it again.
>
> Anita
>
>
>> From: "Stephan A. Schwartz" <[log in to unmask]>
>> Reply-To: Discussion of research and writing about Virginia
>> history <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: Islamic Slavery (was Re: Slavery and immoral stance,
>> etc.)
>> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 16:54:21 -0400
>>
>> Let me suggest that the association of slavery with Southern
>> American history (including Virginia) stems from the unique
>> disposition and cultural affect of the American colonial and post
>> independence periods, which made possible a coherent industrial
>> agricultural system built around cotton and tobacco. One which
>> required large numbers of workers, in the absence of the
>> machinery which would ultimately displace this approach to agri-
>> business. That these workers were African, as opposed to
>> indentured Irish, say, I would propose is a product of both
>> historical synchronicity: the rise of exploration and the place
>> of slavery at the time, in the Africa the explorers discovered,
>> and the evolutionary development that produced a resistance to
>> Malaria in Africans, particularly west Africans -- and which also
>> was the source of this same population's problems with sickle
>> cell trait -- about 2 million Americans have sickle cell trait.
>> About 1 in 12 African Americans has sickle cell trait.
>>
>> -- Stephan
>>
>> On 14 Jun 2007, at 16:29, Anita Wills wrote:
>>
>>> It is interesting that you now lay the association of Islam with
>>> slavery in my lap. I did not make that association, which is why
>>> I posed the question. We are supposed to be discussing Virginia
>>> history in general and American history in particular. I was
>>> simply attempting to bring the discussion back to Virginia
>>> History. BTW I was not posing the question to anyway in
>>> particular, so please do not take offense.
>>>
>>> However, thank you for at least attempting to answer the question.
>>>
>>> Anita
>>>
>>>
>>>> From: David Kiracofe <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> Reply-To: Discussion of research and writing about Virginia
>>>> history <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>> Subject: Re: Islamic Slavery (was Re: Slavery and immoral
>>>> stance, etc.)
>>>> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:21:55 -0400
>>>>
>>>> I'm a bit put off with your association of Islam, which is a
>>>> cultural
>>>> and religious system, with the institution of slavery as
>>>> practiced in
>>>> its various locales. Yes, Islamic law validated the holding
>>>> of slaves,
>>>> but so did Christianity and numerous other faiths. But surely the
>>>> association of the buying and selling of people should be with the
>>>> people who did the buying and selling and not their presumed belief
>>>> systems. Neither the African Muslim seller (and not all
>>>> sellers were in
>>>> fact Muslims) nor the European Christian buyers were behaviing
>>>> in ways
>>>> that one would call specifically religious, rather they were
>>>> engaged in
>>>> a very secular economic activity.
>>>>
>>>> To get to your question though (I wouldn't want to be accused
>>>> of evading
>>>> it), Europeans began associating Africans with exploitable labor
>>>> well
>>>> before Columbus. The Portuguese who acquired the first
>>>> African slaves
>>>> (around 1440) did so from Muslim merchants in West Africa. The
>>>> degradation of people who were so different from themselves
>>>> validated
>>>> Europeans' sense of occupying a higher place in the hierarchy
>>>> of nature.
>>>> Europeans were quick to exploit Native workers in the Americas as
>>>> well. When desease and other problems with Native workers created
>>>> shortages, the contacts with those West African merchants were
>>>> already
>>>> in place and ready to fill the need. Muslim merchants didn't
>>>> create
>>>> this worldview, their role was simply to make it concrete for
>>>> Europeans.
>>>>
>>>> To jump ahead to Virginia, we can see that the English came to
>>>> the new
>>>> world with pre-existing social notions about the nature of the
>>>> universe
>>>> -- in which some were of higher order than others -- and
>>>> economic ideas
>>>> about the exploitation of the labor of lower orders, including both
>>>> Native Americans and Africans as well as other Europeans. If
>>>> Native
>>>> American people resisted coerced labor, those who were prepared
>>>> to be
>>>> dominant were ready to turn to other "lower" people. In
>>>> Virginia that
>>>> meant principally the lower orders of English society and so
>>>> there was
>>>> the massive migration of lower class servants.
>>>>
>>>> One result of bringing over people from the English-speaking
>>>> world was
>>>> that the society of early Virginia was very fluid: one could
>>>> serve one's
>>>> time and then acquire freedom, and possibly land and status,
>>>> and so move
>>>> up from the lower ranks. As the colonial society matured, however,
>>>> there was a desire to make a more fixed, less fluid, society
>>>> (more like
>>>> that of England where rank was very clearly delineated) and so
>>>> there was
>>>> a need to settle on a labor system where labor was unable to
>>>> achieve
>>>> freedom and its material and social benefits. Therefore we see the
>>>> movement toward slavery and particularly African slavery. It
>>>> wasn't
>>>> all about race and yet race was so central to the practice of
>>>> it as to
>>>> make the distinction all but irrelevant.
>>>>
>>>> I know this is a very truncated history of the beginnings of
>>>> slavery in
>>>> Virginia, leaving out the perhaps anomalous experience of the first
>>>> Africans brought to Jamestown, and further skipping past the
>>>> developments in Virginia law pertaining to labor and race, but I
>>>> will
>>>> leave it there and if anyone wants to add, subtract or even just
>>>> quibble, well, that's what we're all here for.
>>>>
>>>> David Kiracofe
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> David Kiracofe
>>>> History
>>>> Tidewater Community College
>>>> Chesapeake Campus
>>>> 1428 Cedar Road
>>>> Chesapeake, Virginia 23322
>>>> 757-822-5136
>>>> >>> Anita Wills <[log in to unmask]> 06/14/07 12:53 PM >>>
>>>> My question is what did Islam have to do with Europeans enslaving
>>>> Indians?
>>>> No one seems to want to answer that.
>>>
>>> _________________________________________________________________
>>> Get a preview of Live Earth, the hottest event this summer -
>>> only on MSN http://liveearth.msn.com?source=msntaglineliveearthhm
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Like puzzles? Play free games & earn great prizes. Play Clink now.
> http://club.live.com/clink.aspx?icid=clink_hotmailtextlink2
|