Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 11 Jun 2005 22:12:35 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I erred in an answer to a question as to the fraction of African blood necessary for a person to be declared a Negro in Virginia in the period 1840-1860.
I said that any person with a Black ancestor more recent than a great-great grandparent was so defined. That was incorrect. In fact, it was not until 1910 that the VA General Assembly redefined the word "Negro" as meaning any person having 1/16th or more of African lineage, i.e., if you had one great-grandparent with African blood, you were by law a Negro. Further, it was not until 1930 when the legislature defined the term as being a person with "any" African ancestry. Sorry for the error. Paul
For a discussion of the matter of definition, see W. L. Katz, Editor, "The Negro in Virginia" (Arno Press & New York Times, NY, 1969) Chapter XXII, and pp 237 et seq., and for a detailed discussion of the whole problem, see that work generally.
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html
|
|
|