I understand the motivation for the Attorney General’s
office requesting the amended wording in the bill is to “address the
possibility of identity theft from records with personal information that
remain in offices longer than required by retention schedules.”
However, I don’t see how mandating destruction of records based on the
General Schedules will prevent misuse of personal information during the retention
lifetime of the records. It seems to me that identity theft prevention is
better served by requiring proper destruction (such as shredding) of materials containing
personal information and by pursuing compliance with the Government Data
Collection and Dissemination Act which covers (by definition) both electronic
and manual records keeping systems.
Ginny Jones
(Virginia A. Jones, CRM, FAI)
Records Manager
Information Technology Division
Newport News Dept. of Public Utilities
Newport News, VA
[log in to unmask]
From: Jones, Virginia
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006
2:46 PM
To: '
Cc:
Subject: RE: SB 461/ HB 959
Conley:
I understand the Senate has passed SB461 as amended and has
communicated it to the House. It appears the companion bill HB959 is
still in the General Laws subcommittee. This bill raises a serious issue
regarding determining and applying administrative value (business process
requirements) to the retentions set by the General Schedules and how to handle
destruction holds due to audits, possible legal issues, etc. If passed,
one of two things will have to happen – 1) LVA will have to reinstate the
process of reviewing and approving exceptions to the General Schedules through
established agency-specific and locality-specific records retention schedules,
or 2) LVA will have to expand the General Schedules to include all
administrative values as identified by localities and agencies. Both
options require more resources than are currently available at LVA. The
impact statements filed with both bills say there is no fiscal impact.
This is only true if the original bill passes and not the amended bill.
B. Each agency shall ensure that records authorized to be
destroyed or discarded in accordance with subsection A, are destroyed or
discarded [ in a
timely manner within six months of the expiration of the
record’s retention period ] in
accordance with the provisions of this chapter. [ All records previously authorized to be destroyed
must be destroyed by July 1, 2007. ]
Ginny Jones
(Virginia A. Jones, CRM, FAI)
Records Manager
Information Technology Division
Newport News Dept. of Public Utilities
Newport News, VA
[log in to unmask]