Mr. Kilby--a literary device does NOT turn a work of history into historical fiction. A literary device can be used in non-fiction to make the story (can we still say that in the history field?) more engaging, compelling, readable, enjoyable, etc... Yours, JM John Maass, Ph.D. 614-506-9537 (c) New book project: http://tinyurl.com/93ahom4 On 10/18/12, Craig Kilby<[log in to unmask]> wrote: My own opinion is that a book should be a work of historical fact, or historical fiction, but it cannot be both.* To quote a work that is historical fiction as historical fact is a bad mistake. Craig Kilby *This is not to say that work of historical fact cannot be written in an engaging manner, as those who know me well can attest On Oct 17, 2012, at 5:15 PM, John Maass wrote: > Is not Jan Lewis being a bit overblown when she faults the author for saying that Monticello was above the clouds? It is an obvious literary device, and I doubt it is meant to be taken literally by the author. Some of Jefferson's visitors also described the spot in similar terms, if I am not mistaken. If Lewis can't recognize this kind of writing, esp. in an intro., I'd hate to read one of her books.... > > John Maass, Ph.D. > 614-506-9537 (c) > New book project: http://tinyurl.com/93ahom4 > > ______________________________________ > To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at > http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html ______________________________________ To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html ______________________________________ To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html