I don't remember this being on my radar screen in my American History studies that seems more like Ancient History at this stage of my life so I must ask: Did they specifically act on their "talk (sic) succession"? I understand the current issue is in petition form or some other similar mechanism for an "action". If I were correct, it would be beyond just the "talk" stage and in a "real" political embryonic stage. Regard, Ray ----- Original Message ----- From: "Greg Carter" <[log in to unmask]> To: <[log in to unmask]> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 10:11 PM Subject: Re: 06262124Z08 Secession But remember the first states to talk succession were the New England states in the late 1830s GC **************Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars. (http://autos.aol.com/used?ncid=aolaut00050000000007) ______________________________________ To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG. Version: 8.0.101 / Virus Database: 270.4.1/1521 - Release Date: 6/26/2008 11:20 AM ______________________________________ To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html