Neil wrote: This is not *politically correct. 1875 N.Y. Times 19 Dec. 2 The other ninety odd thousand charges are all true, and politically correct. 1934 J. STRACHEY Lit. & Dialectical Materialism 47 We are sometimes a little apt to pretend, to wish, to Although I cannot remember exactly when it was (early 80's?) I can remember almost precisely when I first heard the new expression "politically correct". The reason I can remember it is because I knew exactly what it meant when I heard it. To me, now, as I examine the meaning I would say that it came into use as a result of what was a major and very profound tectonic shift in American/Western culture as what had formerly been considered Radical assimilated itself into our culture and became the Norm. The paradigm for almost everything in our way of life.....art, religion, manners, speech patterns, education and studies, morals, historical interpretation, child rearing, politics, the press....even the way professionals like lawyers and doctors began to view themselves as capitalists who could and should and would venture into areas that were once considered unethical like advertising themselves and their wares took an almost sudden shift and were quickly accepted and assimilated into our culture. The paradigm changed but as many, many persons chose to remain outside of that new paradigm and decided not to subscribe to the new one, they quickly saw that theirs had become the "incorrect" view and that it was this new attitude that was the accepted norm, the status quo, the politically correct view. For example, I was the lone conservative in a book club back in the 80's and 90's. Our reading selections reflected the views of the liberal majority and I usually found myself supporting the minority viewpoint. A defining moment in my life was when we were in a discussion regarding political matters and taxation and the welfare state. As my friends in the book club and I got more and more into a particular discussion on the subject of welfare the point finally narrowed down to one thing and that was this: I wanted to know why should I pay taxes to support the immoral lifestyle of teenage girls who were choosing to have multiple children out of wedlock that they could not afford to house, clothe or educate much less nurture and love in a mature responsible manner. We did not go into the area of discussion of where the fathers of these children would be or the purposes in deliberately getting pregnant (whether or not it might have been to simply get a larger check from the government) or if these mothers were drug users. We kept the discussion simple and to the point about supporting a lifestyle that some of us might consider immoral and detrimental to society as a whole. I found myself backed into a wall and the LONE member of the club who thought that there ought to be SOME restrictions placed on welfare mothers; some thing that might discourage out of wedlock births. Well, all I can say is that when I began to be accused of racist attitudes for my "paradigm" was when I saw very clearly that the views that I held had become part of an old paradigm and were no longer politically or socially "correct". I had to concede month after month at my little book club meeting that certain ideas about life in the United States had irrevocably changed forever and that the older ways were now politically incorrect. To me that is what the term means and from whence it stems today. Deane F. Mills York Co, VA