With the current diminishing attention span and knowledge of history by the general public, one of the driving forces in getting any "history" message and building interest these days is a hit film.  I was hoping that "The New World" would be a better film (or at least do better at the box office).  It would have been a terrific pr/marketing tool for the 2007 celebration.  Even Disney's "Pocahontas" was a helpful bit of pop culture to spark interest in Virginia history.
That's the world we live in.
-Melinda
--
Alliance to Conserve Old Richmond
Neighborhoods
1307-A East Cary Street
Richmond, VA 23219
(804) 422-2148
A.C.O.R.N. - Growing a mighty city!

 -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: qvarizona <[log in to unmask]>
> Jon,
>
>   You are absolutely correct in pointing out  the changes from event-driven to
> people-driven history and other differences  in how people  perceive things in
> today's world.
>
>    I suspect that one change that makes it difficult for those  attempting to
> put together anniversary celebrations that appeal to the general public,  is the
> public's lack of knowledge about both  the historical event and  the people
> involved.
>
>    A recent report published in Arizona claimed that beginning in K-12 and
> continuing through college,  history --particularly U.S. history-- seems to have
> almost disappeared  from the educational agenda.  The result is a general
> population who know nothing about Jamestown and do not even know what the
> excitement over the American Revolution was all about.   The report speculated
> that it's only the turkey that keeps the historical Mayflower in the "knowledge
> bank"  of the average American under 50 years old.
>
>    As a history buff  --as distinguished from a history scholar-- I was appalled
> to learn that my own grandson, currently at Stanford on scholarship, thought
> Patrick Henry was the one of the Mayflower passengers. (No, I'm not kidding.)
> Thinking he could not possibly represent today's students, I questioned a
> granddaughter who  graduated from college in Boston and is currently working on
> her Masters.   Ah, I thought,  at least she'll know about the Revolution.
> Wrong.  The only key-word that got a recognition was "Bunker Hill", and all she
> remembered was the mis-nomer.  I was encouraged to find that she did know
> Patrick Henry came on the scene much later that the Mayflower.  "Wasn't he the
> one who rode to warn the militia in Concord?"   When I asked what she remembered
> about Concord, she told me about a wonderful display the park departement (U.S.)
> has there.  Had she been?  Not yet.
>
>   You were right when you wrote of the need  for sponsors of historical
> anniversaries     ". . .to address big themes of social history and give them
> empathetic local and regional faces."    It has to start with education . . .
> and good P.R.  Sure wish it would start in grade school.
>
>   Joanne
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Jon Kukla <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>   It is notworthy that, once again, attendance is lower than had been
> projected for the Winter Olympics in Turin. Time alone will tell whether
> the Jamestown in 2007 makes a big tourism splash for the commonwealth, but
> like the Olympics as a tourist destination, the memorable anniversary
> celebrations of the past - Chicago and Columbus in 1893, St. Louis and
> Lewis and Clark in 1904, and Jamestown in 1957 etc - thrived in a VERY
> different world. A year ago I commented about these changes in an article
> published in History News - the AASLH magazine -- that began with some
> reflections about the underwhelming anniversary celebrations of the
> Louisiana Purchase in 2003 and then drew some conclusions, as follows:
>
> ". . . Public indifference to the anniversary events of 2003 reveals
> more than the long shadows of Lewis and Clark. It may suggest some
> lessons about the practice of public history in post-modern North
> America. For three reasons, national and international anniversary
> celebrations may be as extinct as world’s fairs and the wooly
> mammoth.
>
> First, recreational travel is easier, cheaper, and available to more
> citizens than just a few decades ago. Anniversary celebrations have
> lost their appeal as vacation destinations. Who can blame
> sophisticated recreational travelers for avoiding over-crowded
> exhibits and facilities, peak-season prices, and security concerns?
>
> Second, every modern profession and every marketable commodity has
> its own annual trade shows and conventions. Fairs and anniversary
> events have lost their public function as venues for the exchange of
> technological and commercial information.
>
> Third, we no longer think about history itself as a single
> uncontested narrative. Chicago’s Columbian Exposition of 1893 was a
> major world event. A century later, naive attempts to replicate that
> triumphant mood unleashed bitter controversy. Today’s scholars value
> social history and the long durée over old-fashioned “event-driven
> history.” We value alternate readings and perspectives as we seek to
> hear and portray the voices and experiences of a broader society. We
> are too fully aware of history’s ironies and unintended consequences
> to admit words like celebration into our discourse about
> anniversaries.
>
> Despite these realities, birthdays and anniversaries still have an
> inherent appeal for museums and communities, just as they do for
> families. Properly structured, they continue to offer occasion for
> valid and successful programs. Three suggestions come to mind:
>
> First, biography obviously works. While Columbus was sinking fast,
> Monticello did well with “Jefferson at 250.” Alexander Hamilton is
> all the rage with the anniversary of his fatal duel with Aaron Burr.
> Ben Franklin’s three-hundredth birthday promises to be quite a bash.
>
> Second, research and discovery are keys to vitality. When anniversary
> programs are successful, everyone involved learns something new about
> the event, its participants, or its context. In 2007, for example,
> Virginia officials hope to bolster the economy with a tourism event
> based on the four-hundredth anniversary of the Jamestown settlement.
> I’m just a spectator here, but the newspaper reports are not entirely
> promising. It seems that after a few years of effort, the folks who
> want to repeat the 1957-style celebration (highlighted by the visit
> from the young Queen Elizabeth II) are fifteen million dollars short
> of their sixteen-million-dollar fund-raising target. On the other
> hand, the ongoing investigation of the Jamestown fort site by William
> Kelso’s archaeological team has excited a great deal of genuine
> interest. Research — in this instance by the Jamestown Rediscovery
> project — is a key to vitality.
>
> Third, regional and local anniversaries still have genuine potential.
> Huge international events seem distant, impersonal, and susceptible
> to abstraction. Smaller, coherent, and manageable events lend
> themselves to nuanced interpretation. Surely I am preaching to the
> choir when I suggest to members of AASLH that these microcosms offer
> promising occasions to address big themes of social history and
> give them empathetic local and regional faces."
>
> From Jon Kukla, "A Noble Bargain and Its Centenaries," History News
> (Winter 2005) p. 9.
>
> >
> > My overall point is that when the commemoration is all over, are we going
> > to look back on it as 'another' Lewis and Clark non-event in Virginia? I
> > sure hope not.
> >
> > Randy Cabell
> > Boyce Virginia
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "W. Scott Smith"
> > To:
> > Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 11:02 AM
> > Subject: [VA-HIST] Jamestown 2007 (was "Jamestown and the Little Ice Age")
> >
> >
> >> Cousin Randy and List,
> >>
> >> As a former Virginia 2007 Community coordinator and a current member of
> >> the
> >> Jamestown 2007 Speakers Bureau, I'm more than a little concerned about
> >> the
> >> impression that nothing is happening with the upcoming anniversary.
> >>
> >> The Jamestown-Yorktown Foundation is doing much more than offering
> >> membership in a "1607 Society."
> >>
> >> As the organization designated by the Commonwealth to spearhead the
> >> 400th
> >> anniversary events, it is working closely with the Jamestown Federal
> >> Commission, over 100 local governments, and scores of organizations to
> >> plan
> >> events throughout Virginia in 2007. . . .
>
> Dr. Jon Kukla, Executive Vice-President
> Red Hill - The Patrick Henry National Memorial
> 1250 Red Hill Road
> Brookneal, Virginia 24528
> www.redhill.org
> Phone 434-376-2044 or 800-514-7463
>
> Fax 434-376-2647
>
> - M. Lynn Davis, Office Manager
> - Karen Gorham-Smith, Associate Curator
> - Edith Poindexter, Curator
>
> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
> at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
>  Yahoo! Autos. Looking for a sweet ride? Get pricing, reviews, & more on new and
> used cars.
>
> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
> at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html