Sender: |
|
Date: |
Sat, 1 May 2004 20:23:46 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
From: |
|
Comments: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
It is MUCH more likely that he was of age, however your question was whether of not a man HAD to be 21 to operate a "ordinary"; to that, the answer is no.
----- Original Message -----
From: nel hatcher
To: Paul Drake ; [log in to unmask]
Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2004 7:24 PM
Subject: Re: A question.............
Website: http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~nhatcher/faq.htm
List Admin: Hatcher email list
Researching: Cook, Hall, Hatcher, Kuhns, Miller, Shepherd, Timberman
HATCHER DNA Project: http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~nhatcher/hatDNA.htm
"Genealogy Without Documentation is Nothing" - Paul Drake
<<By the way, Nel, are you absolutely sure he was not of age???>>
This license was issued in Jan 1755. We show this Henry born c1735. The
ability to pin down more accurate dates of birth is always welcome, even if
by only a year or two. That was my reason for asking.........
Nel
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html
|
|
|