VA-ROOTS Archives

July 2003

VA-ROOTS@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"Research and writing about Virginia genealogy and family history." <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 8 Jul 2003 18:45:04 -0500
Reply-To:
paul drake <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
From:
paul drake <[log in to unmask]>
Comments:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (10 lines)
BlankJanet has reminded us that the 16 year old Rev. War vet. mentioned in the previous "who was the heir" question was dead at the end of the war, hence "primogeniture" applied.  She is correct and I was wrong, since that ancient legal doctrine was not abolished in VA till 1785 (at Jefferson's urging).  I am sorry.  Moral to the story?  Be careful and think before you write.  :-)     

Had the young veteran died after in 1785 or after, my analysis would have been correct, since parents, and not siblings, inherit from one who is under age at death.   Paul 

    


To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2