VA-ROOTS Archives

April 2006

VA-ROOTS@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Paul Drake <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paul Drake <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 5 Apr 2006 15:37:00 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
Be careful, Dear Ms. Pat.  A tombstone is "hearsay" in its MOST classical and elegant form.  That does NOT mean that it is in error as to what it relates.  It only means that we must compare it to other sources before we believe it.  I teach my students to stay away from that term - hearsay - as well as such as "secondary", "circumstantial", "preponderance", etc., etc.  There is no place in research or in writing that we are called upon to state other than whether or not some evidence is reliable, unreliable or somewhere in between.

All should - maybe must - remember that we do not label evidence as unreliable because it is hearsay, we label it hearsay because it is unreliable.  Subtle and inconsequential differences, you say?  Hardly !

Paul
***
Thanks everyone. That gives me something to aim for. I'll just avoid the
copies of copies of hearsay from those who didn't seem to bother to find out
if they were giving out correct data.

Pat in Montana



--
----------------------------------------
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
It has removed 1911 spam emails to date.
Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
Try www.SPAMfighter.com for free now!

To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2