Steve & Bunny
Though this has nothing to do with my research, I must said it was very
informative. I also think it was very nice of you to help someone in there
research.
Just wanted to add a thanks for all your work.
Janice Friel
PA
In a message dated 10/14/2009 3:17:53 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:
Hi Scott,
Not being an expert in these matters I can only express my opinion. So
here goes...
1) "Could someone please tell me what the following excerpt from the
personal property tax list of 1789 (Rockingham County) tells me about the age of
this William Lamme?"
From this single excerpt I would say William is at least 21 years of age.
2) "Does the fact that William was listed and that he paid the tax for a
horse tell me that he was over 21, notwithstanding that the column is
blank?"
Yes.
3) "Doesn't the fact that someone was listed indicate that he was at least
16 years of age, and, if so, shouldn't one or the other of those columns
always be checked?"
I have noticed, in many, many tax lists, that the column indicating "over
21" is NOT checked. In other tax lists I have noticed that this column is
ALWAYS checked. It appears (my assumption) that the clerk who wrote the tax
lists either checked all the columns or checked none of the columns. It
would be easier to not check 1000 entries than to check each one, since the
individual is already listed and must be of age.
Back to "the age of this William Lamme?" The best way to infer an
individual's age from tax lists is to go back in years until that individual
disappears. The first year the individual shows up is the year he usually becomes
21 (if he pays the tax) or 16 (if someone else pays the tax). This method
only works well if the individual is resident in the county during the time
he first shows up, like a son becoming of age (16) or paying his own tax
(21). There are other circumstances that could complicate this line of
reasoning. You must really analyze many consecutive tax list years.
With all that said we went back in time to look for William Lamme (Lam,
Lamb). We found him listed in every year back to 1782. He can be found in our
1782 Rockingham Free Sample, on image 20, along with John, Peter, Henry,
Nicholas and Michael. It would appear that he was at least 21 in 1782.
Steve and Bunny
Binns Genealogy dot Com
Scanned Microfilm Images on CD
Virginia Tax List Club
http://www.BinnsGenealogy.com/
----- Original Message -----
From: Scott Simpson
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 8:50 PM
Subject: [VA-ROOTS] personal property tax list, 1789
Could someone please tell me what the following excerpt from the personal
property tax list of 1789 (Rockingham County) tells me about the age of
this William Lamme?
Does the fact that William was listed and that he paid the tax for a horse
tell me that he was over 21, notwithstanding that the column is blank?
Doesn't the fact that someone was listed indicate that he was at least 16
years of age, and, if so, shouldn't one or the other of those columns
always be checked?
Thank you!
Scott Simpson
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html
|
