VA-ROOTS Archives

May 2011

VA-ROOTS@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Charlie Weaver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Research and writing about Virginia genealogy and family history." <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 16 May 2011 07:49:13 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
Many explanations. Oftentimes it was a matter of
choice. If the father acknowledged the child and
wished it to have his name, that was usually granted.
But, most times, as in the case of one of my g+grandmothers,
(bastardy bond of 1807) the child retained the name of
the mother. This is currently the case also, exampled by the daughter/
grandaughter of a friend of mine.  Generally, the surname of
the illegitimate child was the decision made by the Mother,
or in some rare cases, the courts.  I don't know that an
"official" change occurred.
Charlie


On 5/14/2011 1:20 PM, Carole D. Bryant wrote:
> In the early 1800s, what seems to have been the policy or practice of
> naming an illegitimate child?  Would he or she take his natural father's
> surname or that of his mother? If this policy or practice reversed at  some point
> in time, approximately when did the change occur?
>
> Thanks for the help !
>      Carole
>
> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions at
> http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html
>

To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2