VA-ROOTS Archives

October 2005

VA-ROOTS@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Paul Drake <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paul Drake <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 20 Oct 2005 08:42:18 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (66 lines)
For centuries, the word "adoption" has been used to describe any one of many relationships within which one person or family undertook the care and some greater or lesser measure of responsibility for a child of another person.  

For centuries, counties, churches and parishes farmed out children who had no homes, and for as many centuries or more parents have given over children to other families, there to live as servants, to learn such as the "rule of three" and to be emancipated when they came of age or at some other agreed number of years.  Then too, though the legislatures had not yet promulgated laws of adoption, a substantial body of case law developed having to do with the treatment and rights of such kids.  Finally, by contract - bargain - many folks gave kids over to other families under rules and requirements dreamed up by the families themselves. 

Notice that only in the 20th Century have legislatures set forth a specific design and attendant regulations through which courts declared that the legal status of someone was so changed that from then on a person was a part of another family just as though born thereto.

So, while records and censuses used the word "adoption" before 1912, the careful researcher MUST look behind those words in order that the true status and future of the child may be determined.

Paul  

----- Original Message ----- 
  From: [log in to unmask] 
  To: [log in to unmask] 
  Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 7:37 AM
  Subject: Re: Adoptions


  In a message dated 10/19/2005 8:55:59 PM Eastern Standard Time,
  [log in to unmask] writes:
  I am sorry, however, as stated, I believe the record will show that the very
  first court ordered adoption was in 1912 in Mass.  I have no doubt that your
  uncles and MANY, MANY others have been "adopted" over the centuries if - IF -
  you mean by that term that a non-parent undertook to raise a child born to
  someone else.

  On the other hand, if you speak of a court ordered adoption as we NOW know
  the term, I will stand by my statement that the first one in these United States
  was in 1912.

  If you know of an earlier one, please let me have a court record citation in
  order that I may correct my book and the record.

  Thanks.  Paul
  Paul

  In Montgomery County, VA there is a small packet of papers marked "Adoptions"
  from the late 1790s and early 1800s.  These are in the clerk's office, loose
  in the file drawers with criminal warrants and other miscellaneous papers, not
  in the court order books.  However, upon reading these papers they are the
  traditional indentures of orphans to those who could do those traditional
  activities with them.

  These documents were prepared by the Overseer of the Poor.

  I would agree these are not traditional adoptions as we currently think of
  them, but it does raise the question as to whether or not the term was used (it
  was) widely for indentures.

  More questions than answers I realize.

  Warm regards
  Jeff Weaver

  To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
  http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html


  -- 
  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
  Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.12.0/134 - Release Date: 10/14/2005


To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2