VA-ROOTS Archives

July 2012

VA-ROOTS@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Janice Friel <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Research and writing about Virginia genealogy and family history." <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 24 Jul 2012 08:45:49 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (83 lines)
Wow thanks for the great information.
 
Janice
 
 
In a message dated 7/24/2012 8:34:40 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
[log in to unmask] writes:

It  basically depended upon where you lived.  A book called Albion's Seed  
by
David Hackett Fischer describes 4 ways of British immigration in  America.
They included: 
1. Massachusetts: most of its people came from  East Anglia, a high literacy
area. 
2. Virginia: most came from rural  south and west of England with a much
lower literacy rate.  
3.  Delaware:  
4. the "backcountry": Pennsylvania, North Carolina and  others.  They were
from Ireland and Scotland and followed specific  practices such as Quakers. 

In Massachusetts, about 2/3 of the men and  1/3 of the women were able to
sign their wills.  By 1760, literacy had  risen above 84% for men and 50% 
for
women.  Harvard University was  founded in 1636. 

In Virginia, the literacy rate was lower.   However William and Mary College
was established in 1690, the second  university to be established in 
America.
In Virginia, "literacy was an  instrument of wealth and power."  Most
Virginians were unable to sign  their names.  Among the gentry, literacy
approached 100%.  But of  male property holders, only about 50% were able to
write.  Among  tenants and laborers, that proportion fell to about 40%.
Women in VA could  read if they were gentry but most could not sign their
names. This  situation was deliberately contrived by Virginia's elite who
feared  learning among the general population.  Governor William  Berkeley
said: "I thank God there are no free schools nor printing, and I  hope we
shall not have these [for a] hundred years; for learning has  brought
disobedience, and heresy, and sects into the world, and printing  has
divulged them, and libels against the best government." (p 347)  

The elite hired private tutors for the young, sponsored schools of  high
quality for their children  but did not include children from the  general
population. 

The Quakers in Delaware favored literacy but  feared learning.  They tended
to feel that "much reading is an  oppression of the mind, and extinguishes
the natural candle, which is the  reason of so many senseless scholars in 
the
world."  Their literacy  rate was between Mass. And VA.  

Those in the backcountry had the  lowest literacy rates even up to the 20th
century.  

Cynthia  McDaniel 



-----Original Message-----
From: Research and  writing about Virginia genealogy and family  history.
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Janice  Friel
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 9:30 AM
To:  [log in to unmask]
Subject: [VA-ROOTS] Schools

Does anyone  know if there were schools for children in the late 1600s and
early  1700s?

Janice


To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe,  please see the instructions  
at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html


To subscribe,  change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions  
at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html


To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2