Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 22 Jan 2009 13:29:40 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Ted,
I personally believe that we should always use the full given name. I think
that the abbreviations such as you mention have caused all
genealogists/family historians angst for years!
Margaret Kerr Beckwith
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ted Delaney" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 1:15 PM
Subject: [VA-ROOTS] Given Name Abbreviations
I'm curious what the prevailing opinion is about the reliability and
consistency of given name abbreviations in 18th- and 19th-century Virginia
documents.
For example, does "Jas" always mean "James"?
Can "Jos" mean anything other than "Joseph"?
If we are transcribing names from a primary source of that period, is it
wrong to record "Geo" as "George"? Are there professional or ethical
standards about this?
Many thanks,
Ted
**********************************
Ted Delaney
Archivist & Curator
Old City Cemetery Museums & Arboretum
Lynchburg, Virginia
(434) 847-1465
[log in to unmask]
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html
|
|
|