VA-ROOTS Archives

April 2012

VA-ROOTS@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Janice Friel <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Research and writing about Virginia genealogy and family history." <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 11 Apr 2012 10:49:27 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (127 lines)
He is on the Rent Roll for 1704 in K & Q Co., but that would only tell  me 
he was over 21 at that time, right? I did find his daughter in her husbands  
will and it stated that the father's land was left to her , but I  don't 
see that would help me in finding out the father age.
 
Jan ice
 
 
In a message dated 4/11/2012 10:43:09 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
[log in to unmask] writes:

Janice,  that is a requirement for an ancestor to qualify for CDXVIIC. 
Nothing  more. You establish age many ways. You are not going to find any 
birth  records other than in a church parish registry which a few have  
survived.  But you can find a man owning land in 1680 and know he was  born 
before that. Or find land left to a daughter using her married name,  etc.

-----Original Message----- 
From: Janice Friel
Sent:  Wednesday, April 11, 2012 9:23 AM
To:  [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Adventurers of Purse and  Person

Where did you find documentation of age before 1701? I'm looking  for my
folks from K & Q Co.

Janice


In a message dated  4/11/2012 10:13:59 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[log in to unmask]  writes:

There  are two Colonial Dames societies that I know of.  One is Colonial
Dames
XVII Century and the other is Colonial Dames of  America. The first
requires
one to prove to someone of legal age with  "service" prior to  1701. I think
the second one takes much younger  ancestors. That is why I  love the one I
am
in. I love proving back  to the earliest people. I have  done 7
supplementals
since Jan on  new people!  My ancestors who have  never been proven  before.
Google either of these organizations and you will  find the  qualifications
for membership. Both would be by   invitation.
Gale

-----Original Message----- 
From: PJ   THOMAS
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 9:01 AM
To:   [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Adventurers of Purse and   Person

Gale ~ I am the Registrar for my DAR chapter & have a  woman  who may 
qualify
for Colonial Dames ~ would you tell me how  to  proceed?  Thanks in advance.
PJ THOMAS
----- Original  Message -----
From: "Gale Fuller"  <[log in to unmask]>
To:   <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012  8:37  AM
Subject: Re: [VA-ROOTS] Adventurers of Purse and  Person


>  Sally, I am the registrar for my Colonial Dames  XVIIC chapter and it is
> recommended we use the last edition.   Even with different  authors, the
> last editions are usually the  most accurate. Incorrect  or missing
> information from previous  editions can be cleared us. I  know there are
> omissions on one of  my lines that connects to the  Clay's.  The
information
>  has just never been looked for as it is  very available. The authors  are
> looking at the surname that they are  writing about and not 3  or 4
> generations later that the line branches  out to, so be  careful there.
> However in looking for my Green's, I  checked each  of the volumes, not
> editions, but volumes of the 4th  edition,  and there was on page that
> mentioned the name Green in one  book.  So I looked. And low and behold
> there was the whole Harwood  line  which I had not tracked to that point.
So
> treasures are among   these very excellent books.
> Gale
>
> -----Original   Message----- 
> From: Sally Phillips
> Sent: Tuesday, April  10,  2012 5:28 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
>  Subject:  Adventurers of Purse and Person
>
> This book was  recommended on  this list weeks (or maybe months) ago.  I
>  have a free day  tomorrow and would like to check it out at my  local
> genealogical  library (Fairfax Regional).  Their  catalog lists a 1st,
2nd,
>  3rd, and 4th edition, all by  different authors.  What am I looking  at?
Is
> one edition  better than the other.  Should I assume  the 4th edition  is
the
> best?  Or maybe one particular author is  more  authoritative?  Any
> recommendations? Thanks for your   help.  Sally Phillips
>
> To subscribe, change options,  or  unsubscribe, please see the
instructions
> at
>   http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html
> To subscribe,  change  options, or unsubscribe, please see the
instructions
>  at
>  http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html

To  subscribe, change  options, or unsubscribe, please see the  instructions
at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html

To  subscribe,  change options, or unsubscribe, please see the  instructions
at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html


To  subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions  
at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html 

To subscribe,  change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions  
at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html


To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2