VA-ROOTS Archives

February 2008

VA-ROOTS@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Janet Hunter <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Sun, 3 Feb 2008 12:28:50 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (61 lines)
 
Paul and others,
 
This may be stating the obvious but I want to point out that both of Paul's  
recent posts might seem to indicate that those listed as the transportees all  
became/were servants.  And this simply isn't the case, as he  knows.    There 
were people of means (planters or adventurers,  wives and children of same 
who came later after the husband was  settled.) who came on their own, with no 
need to become  indentured.   For example, some ended up on ship masters' 
lists, etc.,  the patent privileges for which were often then sold to somebody else 
who  planned to actually live in VA.  Others probably made some deal so  that 
another could claim them.  
 
 I have an example of this on the Eastern Shore with two ancestors,  John 
Risley & Robert Hyde of York County, who show up in somebody's patent  credits in 
Accomac/Northampton (per Stratton, details I can't  recall).    Per York 
County records they both had their own land,  public positions, etc (well not sure 
about public position for very active  lawyer Robert Hyde who had a juicy 
scandal with his wayward wife in the 1690s),  at pretty much the same time they 
appear on the lists.  
 
The deals cut, the fraud (like multiple claims for the same individual),  and 
the speculation involved in patent rights were it seems legendary.  I  just 
want to point this out for all of you who find a possible ancestor on a  
transportee list, and are thinking almost automatically they were indentured  
servants.   Probably a majority were?   Does anybody  know the percentages?
 
I've been reading recent posts but staying in the background on the  Ancestry 
debate.  Everybody was lauding Heritage Quest, but there are I  believe three 
crucial years missing from their online census records completely,  1830, 
1840 and 1860.  And I couldn't raise anybody in Missouri in  1820.   I am 
extremely grateful for the link that alowed me to access  the site from home, 
however, via my local VA library card.  
 
Best Regards,  Janet Hunter    
 
In a message dated 2/3/2008 11:26:55 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
[log in to unmask] writes:

In  truth, the only fact that may be to be considered reliable within  those
records is that the servant listed there almost surely arrived in  the
colonies at some date prior to the patent.  My article from NGS of  several
years ago is thought authorities as to the many extra-legal  activities that
arose from the loosely drawn legislation.  If you  would like a copy, Email
me off-list.

Paul   







**************Biggest Grammy Award surprises of all time on AOL Music.     
(http://music.aol.com/grammys/pictures/never-won-a-grammy?NCID=aolcmp003000000025
48)

To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2