VA-ROOTS Archives

September 2003

VA-ROOTS@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
westview <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Wed, 24 Sep 2003 11:55:22 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
I disagree with the assumption that a person listed as "At Home" on the
census was an uneducated person.  I have seen it applied to a child not yet
in school and a person who completed school but had no occupation, as well
as someone who never attended school.  It could also appy to someone being
homeschooled or privately tutored.

Kathy


----- Original Message -----
From: "J. Busic" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:36 AM
Subject: Answers for Census Question


Thanks to all who answered my question about the census.  Everyone agreed
that it meant the 5 year old child in question was AT HOME and not in
school.  Someone mentioned that the person with this note was an uneducated
person.  I would assume that most 5 year olds had received no formal
education.  Do you know what the age was when, and IF, children began
attending school in 1870?

To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html

To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2