VA-ROOTS Archives

March 2011

VA-ROOTS@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Research and writing about Virginia genealogy and family history." <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 28 Mar 2011 18:48:41 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (233 lines)
the confederites, but why, they were being besiged





-----Original Message-----
From: Patti Jones Schacht <[log in to unmask]>
To: VA-ROOTS <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Mon, Mar 28, 2011 4:59 pm
Subject: Re: War between the 'STATS'


And "who" fired the first shot....at Ft. Sumter???



----Original Message-----
rom: oxqzeme688 <[log in to unmask]>
o: VA-ROOTS <[log in to unmask]>
ent: Mon, Mar 28, 2011 12:01 pm
ubject: Re: [VA-ROOTS] War between the 'STATS'

orrect Carole, 


-----Original Message-----
rom: Carole D. Bryant <[log in to unmask]>
o: VA-ROOTS <[log in to unmask]>
ent: Mon, Mar 28, 2011 3:38 pm
ubject: Re: War between the 'STATS'

y WHOSE terminology ?
e South was NOT rebelling !  Just exercising their  Constitutional rights 

role

n a message dated 3/28/2011 1:56:14 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
[log in to unmask] writes:
he  official name is War of the Rebellion.
ike Peters
nt from my  Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
----Original Message-----
om:   Fern <[log in to unmask]>
nder:   "Research and writing about Virginia genealogy and family  
story." <[log in to unmask]>
te:       Mon, 28 Mar 2011 11:33:56 
:  <[log in to unmask]>
ply-To:     "Research  and writing about Virginia genealogy and family
story." <[log in to unmask]>
bject:  War between the 'STATS'
ther historical terms - But whatever they  wanted to call it - A CIVIL WAR 
it was not.
r Between the States
e  term "War Between the States" was rarely used during the war but 
came  prevalent afterward in the South, as part of an effort to perpetuate its  

nterpretation of the war.
e Confederate government avoided the term  "civil war" and referred in 
ficial documents to the "War between the  Confederate States of America and 
e United States of America". There are a  handful of known references 
ring the war to "the war between the  states".  European diplomacy produced a 
milar formula for avoiding the  phrase "civil war". Queen Victoria's 
oclamation of British neutrality  referred to "hostilities ... between the 
vernment of the United States of  America and certain States styling 
emselves the Confederate States of  America".
fter the war, the memoirs of former Confederate officials  and veterans 
oseph E. Johnston, Raphael Semmes, and especially Alexander  Stephens) 
mmonly used the term "War Between the States". In 1898, the United  
nfederate 
terans formally endorsed the name. In the early twentieth  century, the 
ited Daughters of the Confederacy (UDC) led a campaign to  promote the term 
ar Between the States" in the media and in public schools.  UDC efforts 
 convince the United States Congress to adopt the term,  beginning in 1913, 
re unsuccessful. Congress has never adopted an official  name for the 
r. The name "War Between the States" is inscribed on the USMC  War Memorial 
 Arlington National Cemetery. This name was personally ordered  by Lemuel 
 Shepherd, Jr., the 20th Commandant of the Marine  Corps.
ranklin Delano Roosevelt referred to the Civil War as "the  four-year War 
tween the States".  References to the "War Between the  States" appear 
casionally in federal and state court documents.
he  names "Civil War" and "War Between the States" have been used jointly 
 some  formal contexts. For example, to mark the war's centenary in the 
60s, the  state of Georgia created the "Georgia Civil War Centennial 
mmission  Commemorating the War Between the States". In 1994, the U.S. Postal 
rvice  issued a series of commemorative stamps entitled "The Civil War / The 
r  Between the States".
ar of the Rebellion
ring and immediately  after the war, U.S. officials and pro-Union writers 
ten referred to  Confederates as "Rebels". The earliest histories 
blished in the northern  states commonly refer to the Civil War as "the Great 
bellion" or "the War of  the Rebellion, as do many war monuments.
he official war records of  the United States refer to this war as "The 
r of the Rebellion", and are a  chief source of historical documentation for 
ose interested in Civil War  research. They are compiled as a 127-volume 
llection published by the U.S.  War Department under the title The War of 
e Rebellion: a Compilation of the  Official Records of the Union and 
nfederate Armies, U.S. Government Printing  Office, 1880-1901, referred to as 
e Official Records.
ar of  Secession
r of Secession is occasionally used by people in the South to  refer to 
e Civil War. In most romance languages, the words used to refer  literally 
anslate to "War of Secession" (e.g. "Guerre de Sécession" in  French, 
uerra de Secesión" in Spanish). This name is also used in Central  and Eastern 
urope, i.e. "Sezessionskrieg" is commonly used in Germany, and  "Wojna 
cesyjna" is exclusively used in Poland (both literally translate as  "war of 
cession").
ar for Southern Independence
e "War for  Southern Independence" is a name used by many Southerners in 
ference to the  war.  While popular on the Confederate side during the 
r, the term's  popularity fell in the immediate aftermath of the South's 
ilure to gain  independence. The term resurfaced in the late 20th century. 
is terminology  aims to parallel usage of the term "American War for 
dependence." A popular  poem published in the early stages of hostilities was 
outh Carolina". Its  prologue referred to the war as the "Third War for 
dependence" (it named the  War of 1812 as the second such war.)  On November 
 
60, the Charleston  Mercury, a contemporary southern newspaper, stated 
at "The tea has been  thrown overboard. The Revolution of 1860 has been 
itiated."
ar for  the Union
me northerners used "The War for the Union", the title of both  a 
cember 1861 lecture by the abolitionist leader Wendell Phillips, and a  major 
ur-volume history by Allan Nevins published in the middle of the 20th  
ntury.
econd American Revolution
 the 1920's historian Charles  Beard used the term the "Second American 
volution" to emphasize the changes  brought on by the Northern victory. 
is is still used by the Sons of  Confederate Veterans organization, though 
th the intent to demonstrate the  depth of the South's cause.
ar of Northern Aggression
e "War of  Northern Aggression" has been used by those who maintain that 
e Union side  was the belligerent party in the war.
ar of Southern Aggression
e  "War of Southern Aggression," conversely, has been used by those who 
intain  that the South was the belligerent party.
rom: Carole D. Bryant  
nt: Monday, March 28, 2011 10:44 AM
:  [log in to unmask] 
bject: Re: [VA-ROOTS] War between the  'STATS'
ame here in Southern Maryland !!
ma  said, "It was NOT a 'civil' war!" !!

 a message dated 3/28/2011  12:42:27 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
[log in to unmask]  writes:
 am a  life long Tennessean and many in my family  were in the CSA. In 
ct 
  great Grandmother told me, when  she was in her eighties, that she 
dn't  
ow  "damyankee" was two words until she was grown. Likewise until I was   
own I had never heard the phrase"War of the Rebellion". It was  always  
lled The War between the States (having upgraded  from the War of  
rthern 
gression). One of my  older relatives called it the "Recent  
pleasantness"  
 into the early 20th century. My own mother warned me  not  to call it 
e 
vil War. As you can see feelings ran pretty  strong  down here!
enta Davis
----Original  Message----- 
om: robert  yingst
nt: Monday,  March 28, 2011 7:41 AM
:   [log in to unmask]
bject: Re: [VA-ROOTS] War between  the  'STATS'
t was also called the War of Rebellion before  that became  politically
correct to use.
n Mar  27, 2011, at 1:11 PM, Fern  wrote:
 This is especially  interesting for families like mine who  had as  many 
 soldiers in the CSA
as they had on the  UNION  side.
 The War Between the Stats. Yes, that's  stats, not  states.
 Historians and  statisticians are questioning the  statistics of
 Confederate War dead. Official military records compiled  in  1866
counted 40,275 North Carolina soldiers who died in   uniform.
Reportedly, North Carolina had more men die in uniform  than  any other
Confederate state, although not as many as  New York in the  Union. Now
new investigations seem to  show the 1866 claims, made when  records
were spotty, are  highly inaccurate.
 While the  new counts  are not yet complete, it looks like the true
count will  be  about 31,000 deaths of North Carolina soldiers during
 the war.  Meanwhile, a separate count iis being made of  Virginia
soldiers and it  looks like its final tally will  also be about 31,000,
far higher than  previous  reports.
 "It's going to be close," says  Virginia  librarian Edwin Ray, the man
making the count of  Virginia deaths in  uniform.
 The issue  tends to be emotional in the affected  states which have
 pride in their soldiers who died for the losing  cause. Whatever  the
final count, many people will have difficulty   believing it.
 New York reported the most deaths  of any state:  46,534, according to
the 1866 federal  report.
 You can  read more in an article by  Cameron McWhirter in the Wall
Street  Journal at  http://goo.gl/usb0U  If this link does not work -  
y  
 this one:
 
tp://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704662604576202823930087328.ht
?mod=WSJ_hp_MIDDLENexttoWhatsNewsSecond
  Another interesting fact is that Cameron McWhirter  had family  fighting 
 for the CSA
and  this family member was a 'friend' of my  distant cousin General  Abe 
 Buford
who rode with General  Forrest  -CSA..

 To  subscribe, change options,  or unsubscribe, please see the   
structions 
at
  http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html
o subscribe,  change  options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions 


tp://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html  
o subscribe,  change options, or unsubscribe, please see  the instructions 
t
tp://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html
o  subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions  

tp://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html
o  subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions  

tp://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html
o subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions at
tp://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html

o subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions at
ttp://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html
 
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions at
ttp://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html


To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2