Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | Yancey, Dennis J |
Date: | Fri, 14 Jul 2006 11:29:27 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I know of a case where "heir at law" was a brother of deceased -
deceased had no children.
-----Original Message-----
From: Research and writing about Virginia genealogy and family history.
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of qvarizona
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 11:26 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [VA-ROOTS] Heir at law
Friends,
In 1800 Virginia, did a man suing an estate as "the heir-at-law"
mean he must have been the oldest son, or is the definition broader
than that?
Joanne
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Next-gen email? Have it all with the all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta.
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions
at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html
|
|
|