If he lived in another county, William Hatcher would not be a tithable in 
Lunenburg. I think there may have more than one William Hatcher.
HBG
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "nelhatch" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 7:00 PM
Subject: Re: [VA-ROOTS] A definition, please.........


HATCHER website: http://hatcherfamilyassn.com
HALL DNA project: http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~nhatcher/hall/HDNAtest.htm
"One of the tragedies of life is the murder of a beautiful theory by a 
brutal gang of facts" - La Rochefoucauld

Bonnie and HBG both verify my basic understanding of this tax exemption, 
which now leads to the next questions.

This Wm rec'd this exemption in 1755 and the record does not indicate 
whether he is a resident of Lunenburg or an absentee landowner.

He does not appear on the earlier 1748-50 Lunenburg tithe lists.

 Would it be correct to assume he MAY not have lived in Lunenburg in 1755 
but was an absentee landowner?

But in 1763 [8 yrs later] a Wm Hatcher OF Lunenburg purchases 100A from Wm 
Watkins.

These are the only 2 recs found for a Wm Hatcher in this county.

IF these Wms are the same person, it would seem strange that an elderly 
person would continue to be buying land 8 yrs later. The same would seem to 
be true if he were disabled.

But if they are the same person, would his previous exemption cover ALL 
lands he may own or purchase later? Seems the county might get a little 
perturbed at losing tax revenue from someone exempted who continues to 
accumulate land.

So, any thoughts on whether we have 1 or 2 Wm Hatchers?

Thanks!
Nel

To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html

To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html