Katie Holland wrote:
>Everything that all of you have said is right within context. What I had
said to Paul PRIVATELY was that the book was not relevant to genealogy - a
history of lobotomies. It is important to stay on point when agreeing with
or disputing a point.
Quite true, Ms. Holland. The difference seems to lie in our concepts of what
is relevant to genealogy. To those of us who feel that "context" is
essential to genealogy, pointing that out is an entirely-on-point way of
"agreeing with or disputing a point."
So, as someone said earlier, we can agree to disagree. <sm>
ESM
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html
