VA-ROOTS Archives

September 2011

VA-ROOTS@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Brooks, Vincent (LVA)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Research and writing about Virginia genealogy and family history." <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 19 Sep 2011 12:01:52 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (114 lines)
The Library of Virginia is pleased to announce that the first
installment of images from the Petersburg chancery causes digitization
project have been added to the Chancery Records Index
<http://www.virginiamemory.com/collections/chancery/> . This project has
been funded, in part, through a $155,071 grant from the National
Endowment for the Humanities <http://www.neh.gov/> . Images for the
first forty-four boxes of chancery suits have been added to the index
(circa 1803-1845). The boxes are not strictly chronological, so not all
images for a given year are available. Additional images will be added
periodically as the project progresses. Be sure to check back!

 

Here are some interesting suits that archivists found while processing,
indexing, and conserving the collection. Many other fascinating and
complex stories will surely be uncovered once the project is complete
and the collection is studied by students, scholars, and family
historians.

 

Petersburg chancery cause 1827-003
<http://www.lva.virginia.gov/chancery/case_detail.asp?CFN=730-1827-003>
involves a dispute over a runaway slave named Davey, alias Davey Smith.
Exhibits found in the suit include a notice published in a local
newspaper describing Davey's physical appearance, occupation, and his
escape (image 22). The suit also contains letters from Benjamin W. B.
Jones of Alabama claiming that he was Davey's owner (image 27). 

 

Also in the newly released images there are two suits that involve an
African American woman named Jane.  She was a slave of Edwin Lanier of
Sussex County, who owned the Prince George County plantation where Jane
lived.  Lanier's will called for Jane to be emancipated upon his death,
which occurred in 1828. She was the only one of Lanier's slaves to be
set free. In the first suit, 1834-015
<http://www.lva.virginia.gov/chancery/case_detail.asp?CFN=730-1834-015>
, Jane sues the administrator and heirs of Lanier's estate to receive
the property and cash bequeathed to her in Lanier's will (image 23). The
second suit, 1840-066
<http://www.lva.virginia.gov/chancery/case_detail.asp?CFN=730-1840-066>
, has its origin in several judgment suits heard in Sussex County.
Lanier's administrator and others successfully sued Jane for debts she
owed as a consequence of the property she received from her former
owner. When Jane could not repay the money owed, she was placed in the
Petersburg jail. The case details Jane's efforts to win back the freedom
she had enjoyed only briefly.  

 

Jane's certificate of freedom, the paperwork that had to be carried by
freed persons of color, is used as an exhibit in the suit (image 46).
To add to the drama, Jane had several children and became pregnant
during the course of the litigation. Sadly, Jane lost the case. Since
she was unable to repay the debts, which included interest, Jane and her
children were to be hired out as "servants and apprentices" for fourteen
years to work off their debts. The sheriff auctioned Jane and her family
to the highest bidder on the steps of the Petersburg courthouse (image
31). 

 

In his will, Lanier allowed that Jane could remain on his plantation for
nine months after his death and then move to a free state of her
choosing. A statute passed by the General of Assembly of Virginia in
1806 stated that freed slaves had to leave the commonwealth within one
year of their emancipation or they forfeited their freedom. The
defendants in the earlier suit (1834-015) cited this law in their
response to Jane's complaint regarding the money and property.  They
argued that Jane was no longer free because she had remained in Virginia
beyond the twelve months. The defendants in the later suit (1840-066)
also cited the 1806 law telling Jane that if she were truly a free
person she would leave the commonwealth. 

 

Did Jane need the money from Lanier's estate to travel to a free state?
Did she choose to stay in Virginia in spite of the law? 

 

 

Vincent T. Brooks

Senior Local Records Archivist

The Library of Virginia: Archives of the Commonwealth

800 E. Broad St.

Richmond, VA  23219

804/225-4452 (voice)

804/692-2277 (fax)

Website: http://www.lva.virginia.gov
<blocked::http://www.lva.virginia.gov/>  

Blog: Out of the Box
<http://www.virginiamemory.com/blogs/out_of_the_box/> 

[log in to unmask] 

 

 


To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2