Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 5 Mar 2006 22:22:28 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
This is from the Introduction of Langley's, South Carolina Deed Abstracts 1719-1772.
Conveyances during the Royal period usually took the form of a "lease and release." Under English law, for an unrestricted conveyance to be made, a buyer had to have possession of a piece of land as a lessor. A separate "lease" for a nominal amount gave him tenancy rights for up to a year. He became eligible to claim possession one day following execution of the lease and thus became entitled to obtain a "release" that gave him absolute and unqualified ownership. These "L. & R." documents contain essentially the same information, and each set was accordingly abstracted as though it were a single record.
Joy
----- Original Message -----
From: nelhatch
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Sunday, March 05, 2006 10:15 PM
Subject: Need an interpretation, please.....
I have the following two records for the same individual and am not at all
sure what is happening here. I "think" the land is being leased for a year
while the landowner continues to reside in his home on that land. I am
simply BURIED in the repetitive verbosity....if this guy was paid by the
word, he was a very rich man :-)
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html
|
|
|