How true, Nel; accuracy and integrity are not as important as a few miserable dollars to most genealogy subscription websites.  I have found my words and whole paragraphs repeated verbatim on the internet, credit for which was taken by some other pretended "writer".  One creep (and he knows who he is) even claimed to be the author of a cute anecdote that I had written in one of my books.

Plagiarism has been said to be flattery, but in my view it is, instead, nothing more than petty thievery.  Especially do I feel that way since, when asked, I have NEVER, EVER failed to grant permission for the use of any of my works, if I am but given credit.  Whatever.  

As I said, write to the internet and the "pay for genealogy" sites at your own peril.  Paul     
  Nel Wrote:
  ....Then a few months ago while searching ancestry.com for one of my Hatchers, I
  saw matches in OWT and decided to click on it. Since I wasn't a subscriber
  to this particular feature, I got only a bare tree leading from my
  individual back to his earliest ancestor. Stepping back thru this tree, I
  started grinning and then at the earliest Hatcher ancestor, I laughed out
  loud. OTW had this earliest ancestor born in the late 1600s with a "wife"
  born in the 1800s.

To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html