VA-ROOTS Archives

November 2011

VA-ROOTS@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Aurelia Brooks <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Research and writing about Virginia genealogy and family history." <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 17 Nov 2011 12:28:00 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (146 lines)
Carole,
You might want to look at www.eugenics.org . There are numerous articles dealing with race, race mixing, etc.. Look at the articles by W.A. Plecker, whom I'm sure you have heard about.
Aurelia


________________________________
From: Carole D. Bryant <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 10:48 AM
Subject: Re: [VA-ROOTS] Virginia personal property taxes and Indians


Thank you very, very  much, Dr. Ragan ! 
What you sent is very, very helpful  !  My questions seem to have been so  “
vexing,” that few offered to tackle them. No, you did NOT muddy the water. 
It  seems to me that some of the folks doing the record-keeping in the 1800s 
may have been the cause of much confusion, by not being completely honest 
about  race. To me, that’s evident upon reading the 1850 census-taker’s 
options: white,  black, or mulatto. Guess he really scratched his head when he 
had to enter the  info about an Indian !  
As you indicated, different counties  may have had different practices, but 
you’ve zoomed in on Virginia and that’s  what I needed. 
If I may add another question … What  were the marriage possibilities for 
Indians in Virginia in the 1800's? Could an  Indian marry a white person, for 
example? I’ve seen a number of examples of  (apparently) mixed couples who 
were living in a married relationship and who  stated (in the long ago past) 
that they were married, yet no records have been  found, not in the 
Halifax-Pittsylvania area that I’m dealing with, nor in  near-by North Carolina 
counties. 
Gratefully,            Carole



In a message dated 11/17/2011 10:12:25 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
[log in to unmask] writes:

Carole,

You have asked important and often vexing questions.  I'll answer them in 
order where I can. I'll also add a caveat that most of my  research has been 
focused on the Eastern Algonquian people who lived in the  Virginia's Lower 
and Middle Peninsulas and the Northern Neck, so circumstances  on the 
Eastern Shore, South of the James, and for the Piedmont and West may  differ 
according to local whites' attitudes about their Indian  neighbors.

> Were Indians ever included in Virginia's  personal  property tax-payers 
lists ?  If so, in what year did they begin to  be included ?  

Based on a number of factors, I would assume that  inclusion varied from 
county to county, but I have not made an exhaustive  comparison. In King 
William County's Personal Property Records, the first time  "Indians" are 
classified as such is 1787, when an assessment was made on  people living at the 
Pamunkey "Indian Town." There were eight heads of  household, two of which 
were taxed. They were likely white men who lived on  the Pamunkey Reservation. 
After 1787, the assessments appear to be  intermittent. So if you're looking 
for reservation Indians, then start with  the County that contains the 
reservation. That said, while the Pamunkey are  listed, there is no mention in 
the King William County Personal Property Tax  Records of the Mattaponi 
Reservation, just a few miles away. 

> I'm  also wondering about part-Indians. Were they included  ?

By the  1830s, Virginia Indians, whether of mixed parentage or not, were 
quickly being  consumed into an amorphous group labeled "free persons of 
color,"  which  also included free "negroes" and free "mulattos." But the color 
line was very  fluid, and some Indians as well as some mulattos could 
sometimes pass for  white. I have a sense that Indians jumped color lines more 
easily than  mixed-blood blacks, but I say that because I am no longer surprised 
to find  Indians listed on different records with different racial markers. 
In general,  if Indians held a protected reservation, there was a greater 
chance that the  Commonwealth considered them as Indian. However, the vast 
majority of Virginia  Indians lived without protected reservations and their 
racial classification  was determined by their white neighbors, which meant 
that Indians frequently  appear in the records as "free colored" or "mulatto" 
or "black."

>  On the same general subject, I'm also  wondering if Indians (and/or  
> part-Indians) were at all considered in  the 1850 Census. If so,  how 
were they 
> designated as to race ?  The column  for  "color" only shows options for 
> white, black, and mulatto (1850  definition =  ??).  

Virginia had long been frustrated about  how to define the racial makeup of 
its citizens, and the racial designations  on the 1850 Census reflected how 
arbitrary identity could be. Indians were  identified variously as white, 
black, or mulatto. It was not until 1866 that  the Virginia Assembly defined 
Indians for the first time in Virginia’s  history!  “Every person having 
one-fourth or more of negro blood shall be  deemed a colored person, and every 
person not a colored person having  one-fourth or more of Indian blood 
shall be deemed an Indian.” (_Acts of the  Assembly_, 1865-1866, pp. 84-85) This 
is also the first time the Virginia Code  uses the term "colored person."

> And, did it make a difference  whether one's mother was an Indian  or if 
one's father was an Indian  ?


Paternity only mattered some times, and it never mattered outside  the 
community.

Hope this is helpful but it probably only muddies the  water for you.

Good luck with your  research,

Edward

Edward DuBois Ragan,  Ph.D.
[log in to unmask]
318.426.9303



On Nov 14,  2011, at 7:17 AM, Carole D. Bryant wrote:

> Greetings,  fellow-researchers !
> 
>    Were Indians ever included  in Virginia's  personal property 
tax-payers 
> lists ?  If so,  in what year did they begin to  be included ?  I'm also 
>  wondering about part-Indians. Were they included  ?
>  
>    On the same general subject, I'm also  wondering if  Indians (and/or 
> part-Indians) were at all considered in  the  1850 Census. If so, how 
were they 
> designated as to race ?  The  column  for "color" only shows options for 
> white, black, and  mulatto (1850 definition =  ??).  And, did it make a 
>  difference whether one's mother was an Indian  or if one's father was an 
Indian ?
> 
>    Thank you very much for your help  !
>        Carole
> 
> To subscribe,  change options, or unsubscribe, please see the 
instructions at
>  http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html
> 

To subscribe,  change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions  
at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html

To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html

To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2