I have been following this discussion.
Several years ago I was puzzled when an executor(a son) declined to accept
his duties.
I later found an explanation in an old/early William and Mary Quarterly.
Early Colonial law not only required the executor to settle the estate,
debts/bills, etc.
BUT also held him/her responsible for settling bills unable to be covered
by the estate assets out of his/her own pocket.
Those 1800-early 1900 W&M Q's make fascinating/absorbing reading and give
excellent understanding of life as a Colonial Virginian.
pjd.
5/19/02

To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html