But there was a point, I think in the early 1700s, where schooling
was discouraged, the gentry even said they did not want the lower
classes to be educated.
Nancy
-------
I was never lost, but I was bewildered once for three days.
--Daniel Boone
On Dec 4, 2008, at 8:24 AM, Harold Gill wrote:
> I'm not so sure that the gentry "tried to keep the 'lower classes'
> here from becoming literate." Every apprenticeship indenture in
> Virginia required that the apprentice be taught to read and write
> and some even specified the number of years schooling the
> apprentice was to be given. Most poor orphans were apprenticed as
> well as the children of poor people.
> HBG
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sunshine49" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 10:38 PM
> Subject: Re: [VA-ROOTS] A question re: education........
>
>
>> An exception to this could be immigrants from England, where they
>> had very good local schools, usually run by churches but
>> occasionally by some wealthy local citizen, where children were
>> taught to read and write, chiefly so they could read their
>> Bibles. Virginia aristocracy, unfortunately, actively tried to
>> keep the "lower classes" here from becoming literate, thinking
>> that would better keep them content with their station in life.
>> But many, many English immigrants, even indentured servants in
>> the 1600s, could read and write.
>>
>> That's an excellent book, though, and fascinating to read.
>>
>> Nancy
>>
>> -------
>> I was never lost, but I was bewildered once for three days.
>>
>> --Daniel Boone
>>
>>
>>
>> On Dec 3, 2008, at 8:26 PM, Cynthia McDaniel wrote:
>>
>>> According to Albion's Seed by David Hackett Fischer, literacy in
>>> VA during
>>> the 17th century depended upon your station in life. Among the
>>> gentry,
>>> almost 100% were literate. They educated their children with
>>> private
>>> tutors. Below that rank, the figure of literacy declines:
>>>
>>> Status of Father Male Female
>>> High 100% 100%
>>> High Middle 87 80
>>> Middle 80 17
>>> Lower Middle 44 20
>>> Lower 50(?) 5.3 (I suspect the first figure for males is wrong
>>> since it is higher that the figure for the lower middle
>>> class...but that's
>>> what Fischer says.)
>>>
>>> According to Fischer, the prevailing attitude of the gentry was
>>> that it was
>>> "better be never born than ill-bred (i.e., unschooled)" if you
>>> were of the
>>> elite class. However, for other classes, the attitude of the
>>> gentry was: "I
>>> thank God there are no free schools nor printing...for learning
>>> has brought
>>> disobedience and heresy, and sects into the world, and printing
>>> has divulged
>>> them, and libels against the best government. God keep us from
>>> both!" This
>>> attitude was in place in England (southeastern part) long before
>>> slaves were
>>> brought into VA in large quantity.
>>>
>>> Fischer says that the libraries of the gentry sometimes rivaled the
>>> libraries of colleges. But the yeomanry owned fewer books and
>>> servants
>>> owned nearly none.
>>>
>>> I think the idea that the first son would be educated the most is
>>> likely. I
>>> base this opinion on the research of my own line. In a
>>> collateral line of
>>> mine, the Scarboroughs, Edmund Scarborough and his second son,
>>> Edmund, came
>>> to VA about 1633. Edmund I's first son, Charles, was in college
>>> in London
>>> (Caius College). Charles (the first son) was christened in Dec
>>> 1615 in
>>> London, graduated from Caius College in Cambridge in March
>>> 1633/1634 at
>>> 17/18 and graduated from A.M. of Caius College in 1639. He was the
>>> physician for King Charles II, James II and William III.
>>> Because Edmund II
>>> accompanied his father, it doesn't appear that he went to
>>> college (he was
>>> two years younger than Charles). He may have been self-educated
>>> after
>>> coming to VA because he advanced in station to Lt. Colonel and
>>> served as
>>> Speaker of the House of Burgesses, was a merchant with several
>>> vessels
>>> traveling between Massachusetts, MD, VA and England (and
>>> possibly SC). He
>>> was the largest land owner in VA at the time and a fierce
>>> competitor in
>>> ensuring his self-interest. (He moved the line between MD and VA
>>> to maintain
>>> his property in VA...the line was changed after vigorous protest
>>> by the
>>> Governor of MD. Nor was he friendly towards Native Americans
>>> who referred
>>> to him as the "Conjuror".
>>>
>>> As far as colleges in the Americas, the College of William and
>>> Mary was the
>>> second college established in the Americas in 1693 so the gentry
>>> did not
>>> have to send their sons to England.
>>>
>>>
>>> Cynthia McDaniel
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Research and writing about Virginia genealogy and family
>>> history.
>>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of nelhatch
>>> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 12:03 PM
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Subject: [VA-ROOTS] A question re: education........
>>>
>>> HATCHER website: http://hatcherfamilyassn.com
>>> HALL DNA project: http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~nhatcher/hall/
>>> HDNAtest.htm
>>> "If you can't stand the skeletons, stay out of the closet" - Val
>>> D Greenwood
>>>
>>> I have a question (or two) about the customs in the 1600s
>>> regarding the
>>> education of one's sons.
>>>
>>> For a man of above average means, was it the norm to educate
>>> one's sons in
>>> England? Or might only the eldest son be given this type of
>>> education?
>>>
>>> What would the age of a young man have to be to enter college? I
>>> believe one
>>> would graduate college in that time period at about the age of
>>> 18? Is my
>>> thinking correct on this?
>>>
>>> Thanks for any input on this!
>>>
>>> Nel Hatcher
>>>
>>> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the
>>> instructions at
>>> http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html
>>>
>>> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the
>>> instructions at
>>> http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html
>>
>> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the
>> instructions at
>> http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html
>>
>>
>> --
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.552 / Virus Database: 270.9.12/1824 -
>> Release Date: 12/2/2008 9:31 AM
>>
>
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html
|