VA-ROOTS Archives

February 2012

VA-ROOTS@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Stevens <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Research and writing about Virginia genealogy and family history." <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:08:11 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (83 lines)
Linda,

Thanks.  I was there reading and basically found what I wanted to know, 
except what if it were different markers in the same DNA scheme that did not 
compare.  i.e.. 4th marker vice 3rd., etc.

Regards,

Steve
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Linda Threadgill" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 11:37 AM
Subject: Re: [VA-ROOTS] Genealogy


> Steve,
> Yes, If you test 46 markers and you match the person 45/46 the probability 
> that you and the other person share a common ancestor is high. It is less 
> probable if you and the person do not share the same surname. If you go to 
> FTDNA , their FAQ should answer questions. As for your question regarding 
> if someone tests 36 and the other 46, well both will have to test for the 
> same amount of markers. The person who tested 36 will have to test 46 
> markers to get a good comparison or bother can be compared by used only 36 
> markers for both.  Do they match 36/36 at 36 markers? BTW,,you shouldn't 
> have to test with FTDNA to be able to access their FAQ section. I could 
> possibly send you a comparison chart to your personal email address, but I 
> don't think the mailing list can handle it if I cut and pasted it into 
> this email.
> Linda
>
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: Steve Stevens
> Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 6:51 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [VA-ROOTS] Genealogy
>
> While on the subject of DNA, does anyone know how to interpret the 
> results?
> As an example: Two people test 46 marker and their DNA match exactly, 
> except
> for one marker.  Let's say the one marker is off by one, a 12 instead of 
> 11.
> How does one determine the Most Recent?  Does it matter which marker it 
> is?
> What if one person does a 36 marker and the other a 46 and off by one?
>
> Doing the test is one thing, interpreting them is another.  I know the 
> labs
> do the readings and Most Recent, but if you think (would say know) two
> people are from the same great grandfather, but a marker is off by one and
> the results say Most Recent is 6, then what do you reason from the 
> results?
>
> Thanks for any help.
>
> Regards,
>
> Steve
>
> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions 
> at
> http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2114/4835 - Release Date: 02/27/12
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2114/4837 - Release Date: 02/28/12
>
> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions 
> at
> http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html 

To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2