VA-ROOTS Archives

May 2004

VA-ROOTS@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Paul Drake <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paul Drake <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 1 May 2004 20:10:47 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
Nope, so long as he had posted bond - and here he did with an accompanying surety - guaranteeing the county that all would be operated within the law, he could be issued a license for an ordinary, though such a licensing to a underage person would be most unusual.   By the way, Nel, are you absolutely sure he was not of age???
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  ....
  Hi All,

  I have the following record which raises a question......

  ChesterfieldCo, VA
  January Court 1755, Page 32
  On petition of Henry Hatcher junr who entered into Bond with Surety as the
  law directs License is granted him to keep Ordinary at Orbornes(?) in this
  County for one year next owning(?)

  Was it not law that one had to be of age (21) to run an Ordinary or am I
  misinterpreting this word - Ordinary?

  Thanks!
  Nel


To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2