VA-ROOTS Archives

August 2009

VA-ROOTS@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Research and writing about Virginia genealogy and family history." <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:01:26 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (45 lines)
I agree with Lesley, the DNA is clear proof of things we would otherwise not 
know.  In our family, in the contemporary history, we had a grandfather who 
married the  love of his life, they had many children, and when his wife 
died, he did not remarry.  His grandson ran DNA and found that his father, 
the firstborn was not of the family but belonged to a family whose name 
matched the one who  lived next door to grandma.  It is obvious to us that 
Grandpa knew his loved one was pregnant, there was never a whiff of scandal 
involved with this family and the oldest child was loved by the entire 
family. We would have never known except for the DNA.  So it did happen.  We 
are sorry that the  family member found out about his particular ancestry 
that way, but he understands that his grandfather did an honorable thing.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Lesley L Shockey" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 8:13 AM
Subject: Re: [VA-ROOTS] DNA Evidence


> From my experience with FTDNA I would gladly take DNA evidence over a 
> "paper trail" any day.  The DNA of three out of nineteen in our project 
> did not match the paper trail.  Two were quite surprised but for one it 
> matched "family stories" not paper trails.  Both of the other two, when 
> the paper trail was examined closely, problems could be seen.
>
> Grandparents raising a grandchild as their own child while their next 
> youngest child, a single daughter of 17 or 18 is still living at home 
> happened more often than many will admit.  It raises questions especially 
> when the descendants DNA matches that of nearby neighbors and they had 
> sons in the age range of 17 to 25.
>
> Les
>
> On 8/19/2009 12:41 PM, Carole D. Bryant wrote:
>> Don't be too quick to accuse your husband's ancestors !
>> Neither "paper" nor DNA is without fault ! ! ! !  One little false 
>> assumption .... and you may have damaged the reputation of an innocent 
>> forefather.
>
> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions 
> at
> http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html 

To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-roots.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2