VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Barbara Vines Little, CG, FVGS" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 19 Jul 2010 20:18:49 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
I agree (see below); however, I have found them very willing to make 
corrections when provided with source-cited material that defines the 
needed corrections. They did so with the King George - Stafford 
boundaries (depicted incorrectly in a number of other sources) and I am 
hopeful that we will see such a correction with New Kent- James City and 
any others that are brought to their attention.

Barbara Vines Little, CG, FVGS
PO Box 1273
Orange, VA 22960
[log in to unmask]
540-832-3473


On 7/19/2010 4:28 PM, Jim Glanville wrote:
> .........
> However, on the basis of the one example I have examined, Virginia 
> users of the data base should be aware that while the Atlas makes 
> reasonable interpretations of historical evidence, the shown county 
> boundaries are just an interpretation, and that for early Virginia the 
> mere availability of lines does not call for suspension of our  
> judgment and appropriate skepticism.
>
> Jim Glanville
> Blacksburg-in-former-Fincastle-County (I think)
>
> ______________________________________
> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the 
> instructions at
> http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
>
>

______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US