VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Anne Pemberton <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 20 Feb 2003 13:09:36 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
Excuse me, but history tells us that the confederate rebels were the
invading army, not the Federal troops. The rebel army began it's invasion
of the United States by attacking Fort Sumpter, and continued when they
struck in Maryland and Pennsylvania. As John Carter pointed out, the rebel
army even "invaded" southern communities in the pursuit of their illegal
"cause". And, yes, it was illegal then and now to secede. As others have
recently pointed out, most of the south didn't even trust their own
citizens to put the secession to a popular vote.

                                                 Anne


At 09:20 AM 2/20/03 -0500, you wrote:
>It is very difficult to judge Southern support for the Union due largely to
>the fact that the Union was an invading army and there was a real need to
>support family on the home front.  However, I see about as much support for
>the Union troops entering the South as Lee saw when he entered Pennsylvania
>and Maryland.
>
>Jeff Southmayd
>
>To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
>at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

Anne Pemberton
[log in to unmask]

http://www.erols.com/stevepem
http://www.educationalsynthesis.org

To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US