Herb--

In one or two short, simple sentences, can you state what you take the DNA tests to have proven?

In an earlier post addressed to me, you implied that you did not think that the DNA tests had proven anything at all.  Here, however, you imply that you believe that they *did* prove something, although you do not state what that something is that you think they proved.  (See the excerpt from your post, below.)

I would like much to understand your argument.  If you could write a short post that restricts itself to just this one question, that would be helpful to me.

All best,
Kevin

---- Original message ----
>Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 11:37:19 -0400
>From: Herbert Barger <[log in to unmask]>  
>Subject: Re: Annette Gordon-Reed praised by Edmund Morgan  
>To: [log in to unmask]
>

>I have well explained the DNA procedures on this forum and how they have
>been twisted to fit certain agendas. The DNA is dependable........just
>the authors of politically correct books that lack telling the truth.
Kevin R. Hardwick, Ph.D.
Department of History
James Madison University

______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html