VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Michael B. Chesson" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 19 Sep 2009 15:51:55 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (69 lines)
And don't forget that Dickens married a sister of his late wife; there is an attraction sometimes, for some people, to the sibling of a beloved spouse.
 
Michael Chesson

________________________________

From: Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history on behalf of Jon Kukla
Sent: Fri 9/18/2009 3:38 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [VA-HIST] Marriage law & Incest



Henry,
   I dug into this a while back when I was research Mr Jefferson's Women
- but it was one of those things that ended up on the cutting-room floor.
  Marryng a sibling of one's deceased spouse WAS a pretty common event in
colonial Virginia -  . . . anyone who's done much research in
colonial Virginia families -- I dare say in colonial American families - has
stumbled across plenty of examples, though of course its hard to put your
hands on them when a question like this arises.  The VA-HIST archive may
even have some queries and responses back in 04 or 05.
   I had some very helpful email exchanges with Lorri Glover - who treated
some of this in her book _All our relations : blood ties and emotional bonds
among the early South Carolina gentry (Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University
Press, 2000).
   The upshot of it, as I recall, is that after the Reformation the Church
of England retained the Catholic provisions of canon law that
regarded remarriage to the sibling of a spouse as incest, but that those
provisions were loosened in 18th-c Virginia - which would make the 19th law
like the one you describe in effect a _reinstatement_ of mainstream
Anglican/Catholic doctrine.
All best,
Jon

--
Jon Kukla
www.JonKukla.com
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Henry Wiencek <[log in to unmask]>wrote:

> I was surprised to read in Annette Gordon-Reed's book on the Hemingses that
> in the early 19th century Virginia outlawed marriage between a man and his
> deceased wife's sister, on the grounds that marrying a sister-in-law was
> incest by affinity (not by blood). I don't know the text of the law, but
> presumably the reverse was also true: a widow could not marry her
> brother-in-law. It's my impression that in the earlier days such marriages
> were relatively common in Virginia. My question for the lawyers on the list
> is: does anyone know when Virginia repealed this ban - or is it still on
> the
> books? Would Virginia have recognized such a marriage if it had been
> solemnized in another state or country?
>
> Henry Wiencek
>
> ______________________________________
> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
> http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
>

______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html



______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US